So, if for nothing else than to help people learn from our mistakes, I'd like to start compiling accounts of the unravelling/failure of social.coop.

I will be reaching out to particular people over the next few days, but if anyone out there left/chose not to join social.coop for Reasons and would be willing to talk about it (anonymously if you want), please DM.

Please boost for visibility.

#meta #socialcoop

@nev My perspective:

The problems on #socialcoop were already clearly visible back in June/July when I had my initial interactions. I decided to check it out after @eloquence and I had talked about it at #osbridge. At the time the CoC discussion was happening in a Google doc, and since I’ve got some expertise there I decided to contribute and see how the reaction was.

Here’s some of the discussion .

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YNXdnDTRz897rXRHoTGwaeoFfZI7-_cwplF2qvy-W8Q/edit?disco=AAAAB_7plzg

To me it seemed like an uniformed white guy was trying to dominate the conversation, ignoring best practices and perspectives from people from marginalized groups, and leadership wasn’t doing anything to prevent that from happening. My response was to decide not to invest any more time and energy until things had played out. A good call, if I do say so myself :)

After which:

- There was similar behavior on Loomio. Here’s a thread that caused at least one trans person to leave #socialcoop Again, no apparent reaction from leaders. https://www.loomio.org/d/QdE02gzt/federation-policy/55

- the revised version of CoC put forward to a membership vote continued to ignore best practices (as well as my and others’ input), explicitly relegating people from marginalized groups to a footnote.
@melody discussed this at https://www.loomio.org/d/SuHPnjvh/code-of-conduct-and-reporting-guidelines-rc1-membership-vote-/48