Azralon 
I was browsing some toots and I came across an user that is throwing hate speech through the fediverse.
Please share this toot so other instances can block that instance.
Instance name: voluntaryism.club
User profile: [email protected]
very fast doggo@azralon wow is dtluna still at it? I never understood the appeal of social media to people who very obviously don't want to have any meaningful relationships
@vroom this is a platform inside the fediverse, named pleroma. Their users are usually fascists and they like what is called "free speech".
@azralon while there are many facist free pleroma instances, a lot of the core userbase comes from pre-mastodon fediverse, many gamergate types, shallow center right thinkers, and sometimes abominations like dtluna.
I would shit on lain tho, theyve got a nice things going with pleroma and a lot of the development effort that goes into it are disillusioned former masto devs that had problems with gargron
@vroom Yes. I know plemora has very good instances too, but they are few, and I am not worried about them. I am worried about that kind of instance I reported. I want to have contact with pleroma yes, but not when they act like that.
@azralon yes I am definitely in agreement that dtluna should be nuked off the fediverse.
dtluna is a persistently hostile user that thinks their edgyness culminates in some kind of charm.
🕷️ Chris 🕷️ 🏴@azralon @vroom This is absolutely wrong. Sure, some of the seedier bits of the old GNU Social set started Pleroma instances but blaming the software is pretty ridiculous.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus @azralon wait what? who is blaming the software?
@vroom @azralon That's my interpretation of blaming "Pleroma" for the people who use it. There's nothing that'd stop a neo-nazi from running Mastodon, for instance.
very fast doggo (@[email protected])
1.59K Toots, 326 Following, 206 Followers · vroom!
@anarchosaurus you know if you read further into this thread I think youll find that no one disagrees with you.
I see now, thanks.
@anarchosaurus @vroom I am talking about the ideological view that most pleroma users constructed around their platform. I am not blaming the software.
@azralon @vroom I don't understand that logic is all. But then, I also don't really see Pleroma and Mastodon as separate platforms. Rather separate entry-points into the same network which is likely why.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus neither me. I see pleroma as part of the fediverse. But you can't deny some users there a pretty intolerants.
@azralon No, and I won't deny it. But I also don't think pleroma/mastodon as short-hands for intolerance/tolerance is a meaningful way to identify or address bigotry
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus No. What I am trying to say is that pleroma and mastodon constructed their community with different ideological views IN GENERAL. If you pay more attention you will see that pleroma has more liberals/ancaps and mastodon has more communists/anarchists, that is usually a more progressive and tolerant community.
@azralon I have noticed a difference, of course I only have a limited view of the fediverse. I don't see this as constructed with its implication of intention though. Pl instances tend to be a lot smaller as well, maybe that is also a dynamic at work also.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus Yes. The users of these two platforms formed different views of the world. And most of pleroma users followed liberal ideas. I don't blame them, I blame the devs that ended up gathering such community. Mastodon and Pleroma could be united if they didn't accept that kind of "no rules and free speech" that most of the times end up in fascism.
@azralon This is even less coherent. I don't see what the devs have to do with it given how little control they have over users.
Part of the reason why Masto instances might seem more ordered is that it's harder to run one then Pleroma, so there are fewer of them - allowing a much more homogeneous community.
To be clear, I'm also opposed to the liberal vision of free speech you've mentioned. But I think your blame is totally misplaced.
Part of the reason why Masto instances might seem more ordered is that it's harder to run one then Pleroma, so there are fewer of them - allowing a much more homogeneous community.
To be clear, I'm also opposed to the liberal vision of free speech you've mentioned. But I think your blame is totally misplaced.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus This is coherent yes. The devs gathered this kind of community so it is their fault.
@azralon That's a reach
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus they didn't give limits to their users.
@azralon Such as?
It's free software, any technical limits that were placed could have easily been circumvented.
It's free software, any technical limits that were placed could have easily been circumvented.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus That instance don't have rules, neither admins. Pleroma is full of such instances.
@azralon Many like mine are single-user instances, in which case this is pointless. As another example, the user you mentioned earlier wouldn't have been stopped by such a thing since they are the instance admin.
If the common case were for Pleroma to have large instances like Masto I think you'd have a better argument that those moderation tools would make a big difference, but that isn't the case here. Your position that pl devs are somehow responsible for the behavior of their users is still not supported IMO.
If the common case were for Pleroma to have large instances like Masto I think you'd have a better argument that those moderation tools would make a big difference, but that isn't the case here. Your position that pl devs are somehow responsible for the behavior of their users is still not supported IMO.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus yes it is supported because they had influence over the users when it was a small platform. Now they still have ideological influence because the first users influenced others, but they do not have control anymore and they can't, exactly because that is decentralized. They didn't impose a common agreement of no free speech and no fascism between instances in the beginning for example, like Mastodon did. Now it is too late.
@azralon Can you show me where this agreement from Masto's early history is? I can think of a few instances that certainly did have a liberal vision of free speech in the past. Or are you referring to a shared ban/instance block list?
I don't recall any structure like you mention existing, and have been in the fediverse since before Masto was just a personal project.
I don't recall any structure like you mention existing, and have been in the fediverse since before Masto was just a personal project.
Azralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
@anarchosaurus You will not find this agreement anywhere because it is implicit. Of course it doesn't apply to some instances of Mastodon. But if you check most of Mastodon instances you will see what I am talking about.
Suzy CreamcheeseAzralon :ancom: (@[email protected])
15 Toots, 8 Following, 5 Followers · From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
🔌💘🐶@USBloveDog Thank you for your opinion. Our team will analyze it as soon as possible.
SEALIRL@animeirl yeah, my mistake. Sorry.
SKANARCHO-SYNDICALISM@azralon
Are you shocked that anyone that identifies with voluntaryism would be a chud?
Are you shocked that anyone that identifies with voluntaryism would be a chud?
@frickhaditcoming I am not shocked, I am just reporting that conduct. This is what we should all do.
About voluntarism: I recommend you to search that word in the dictionary. Anarchists are not against voluntarism. That "an"caps have misrepresented the word "voluntarism", making us believe that it is something specific to them. And it is not, on the contrary, they interpret voluntarism in an erroneous and fascist way.