Meet Sabina Leonelli, Professor of Philosophy and History of #ScienceandTechnology and head of the Public Science Lab, in this NewIn episode. She talks about history, #participatoryresearch, and the perception of #philosophers in Germany: http://go.tum.de/293415
▶️ https://youtu.be/r68jQKLqd34
📹ProLehre
Bringing Community Mapping to GIScience 2025 🌍
Anne Schauss & Diego Pajarito (University of Glasgow) will co-host a workshop on participatory mapping bringing together researchers and practitioners, and share insights from case studies on how these initiatives shape communities — and the challenges & opportunities they bring.
👉 https://heigit.org/events/heigit-and-urban-big-data-centre-at-giscience-conference-2025/
A new paper discusses workflow development for ePRO symptom monitoring to support PRO(M) implementation into practice using the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time framework:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-025-03995-y
#HRQL #PatientCentered #ImplementationScience #ParticipatoryResearch
Background Real-time electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring is a complex intervention with few examples of successful implementation at scale. A key challenge is designing a clear ePRO symptom monitoring workflow to support implementation into practice. We aimed to create an empirical and theory-informed site-specific workflow guided by the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) implementation science framework. Methods A five-step process was undertaken to customize a generic ePRO symptom monitoring workflow to create a site-specific version: (1) design a generic ePRO symptom monitoring workflow through a qualitative study with key stakeholders; (2) conduct co-design workshops to understand stakeholder preferences regarding a site-specific version; (3) code co-design workshop data using the AACTT framework to produce a provisional site-specific version; (4) conduct a final co-design workshop using the AACTT framework to finalize stakeholder preferences for a site-specific version; and (5) code co-design workshop data using the AACTT framework to produce a final site-specific version. Results Participants (n = 27) included nine patients, four caregivers, four oncologists, four nurses, two pharmacists, two clinic administrators, and two Electronic Medical Record (EMR) analysts. Provisional and final site-specific workflows were generated outlining the key AACTT components for each step of ePRO symptom monitoring. Conclusion We demonstrated the value in using the AACTT to guide the co-design of a site-specific workflow for ePRO symptom monitoring. By describing this process in detail, we will enable others to replicate this process for creating site-specific workflows not only for ePRO symptom monitoring, but for any complex clinical process.
CAPS 2025, like the previous conferences of the Association for Advancing Participatory Science (AAPS, formerly the Citizen Science Association), was an opportunity to learn about the state of citi…
The participatory science conference in Portland, OR - thoughts from the conference #CitizenScience #ParticipatoryResearch #CommunityScience
CAPS 2025, like the previous conferences of the Association for Advancing Participatory Science (AAPS, formerly the Citizen Science Association), was an opportunity to learn about the state of citi…
Research participants being fully informed about the research and to provide their voluntary consent to participate is a cornerstone of ethical research practice.
Secondary school pupils in Cameroon explored how to engage with consent principles, main focus were benefits and risks of participation, #VoluntaryParticipation, and confidentiality
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161251335709
Technische Universität München
Urban Studies Foundation
Muki Haklay
HeiGIT
Jan R. Boehnke
Muki Haklay