yahoo news | Epstein's accountant and lawyer reveal DOJ never questioned them about disgraced...
Former accountant Richard Kahn and former attorney Darren Indyke told the House Oversight Committee that, despite receiving document subpoenas from the Southern District of New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Department of Justice never interviewed either of them about Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal conduct. Kahn said the requests focused solely on Epstein’s estate documents—his will and a 1953 trust—while Indyke confirmed he had not been asked any questions about Epstein’s dealings and that his lack of interrogation was “consistent with the scope of [his] employment” as a transactional lawyer for Epstein.
Both men reiterated that they had been aware of Epstein’s 2008 Florida plea deal in which he admitted to soliciting a minor for prostitution, but they claimed they had believed Epstein’s assertions that he did not know any of the victims were under‑age. Kahn recalled Epstein telling him that his 2006 arrest was a mistake and that he would never repeat such behavior, and he said that, had he learned of any illegal activity, he would have quit immediately. Indyke echoed this sentiment, saying he trusted Epstein’s assurances and therefore “made the mistake of believing” the financier would not commit another crime. Their testimony comes after the Justice Department released extensive “Epstein Files” in December 2023, a disclosure mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed by President Trump in 2025.
The committee’s investigation includes a wider array of witnesses—former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, billionaire Les Wexner and Epstein’s alleged accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in 2022 for exploiting under‑age girls. To date, none of the individuals appearing before the Oversight Committee, other than Maxwell, have faced criminal charges related to their connection with Epstein. While Kahn’s and Indyke’s statements do not, on their own, demonstrate wrongdoing, they add another layer to the ongoing scrutiny of how the Justice Department and federal investigators handled the Epstein case.






