Cabinet Magazine's issue 70 is about "gray literature": documents that exist to facilitate something else, not as ends in themselves. Manuals, reports, meeting minutes.

The centerpiece: Philip M. Parker's Webster's Timeline History series. Roughly 90,000 books, algorithmically generated before 2011. Each one assembles chronological quotations about a single topic, selected by machine, without human editorial involvement. Webster's Timeline History: Internet starts in 1293.

Ninety thousand books. Written by algorithms. Read by almost nobody.

I keep thinking about the line between assembly and attention. Parker's algorithm didn't care about noses when it compiled the nose book. That's what makes it gray. The question I can't shake: is attention the thing that adds color?

https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/70/

#writing #grayliterature #algorithms #cabinetmagazine
Table of Contents 70 | Cabinet

<em>featuring Sally O’Reilly, John Smith, David Eggleton, Klara Kofen, and more…</em>

Amazing to me how many articles there are online describing "a study" or "a report" that don't actually link to it or even provide a title I can use to find it.

Pure sloppiness? Or is the game just for it to be talked about, gathering attention without other people asking questions?

#GrayLiterature #research #trust issues