The Grammarly lawsuit is a good reminder to be cautious about the tools you use. The allegation is that they are storing user data. Always read the terms of service! #Grammarly #AIWriting #SelfPublishing #AuthorTools #KDP
The Grammarly lawsuit is a good reminder to be cautious about the tools you use. The allegation is that they are storing user data. Always read the terms of service! #Grammarly #AIWriting #SelfPublishing #AuthorTools #KDP
The Grammarly lawsuit is a good reminder to be cautious about the tools you use. The allegation is that they are storing user data. Always read the terms of service! #Grammarly #AIWriting #SelfPublishing #AuthorTools #KDP
"It’s true that citing the names of specific people can be a powerful way of shaping an LLM’s response. Plenty of prompts start by telling Claude something like, “You are ________, the world’s leading expert in ___________.” You could ask ChatGPT: “Rewrite this essay in a spare, understated style using clear, direct language and short sentences, favoring simple vocabulary over ornate phrasing, emphasizing concrete details and action over explanation, avoiding abstraction and sentimentality, and conveying emotional depth indirectly through precise, unadorned prose.” Or you could just type “Rewrite this like Ernest Hemingway” and save some keystrokes.1
But does that LLM’s response mean the Hemingway estate is now owed money? And does Grammarly saying “This suggestion is inspired by Joshua Benton’s ‘Nieman Journalism Lab analyses'” mean Mehrotra owes me a steak dinner?
Check out the full Decoder episode to hear their vigorous back-and-forth over how, as Patel puts it, “people don’t understand the difference between copyrights and trademarks and names and likeness,” and that “AI is collapsing those differences faster than ever before.”"
#AI #GenerativeAI #LLMs #SuperHuman #Grammarly #Copyright #IP
@reckless1280, editor-in-chief of @theverge, was one of the people whose name was used without permission in Grammarly's short-lived "Expert Review" feature. He talked to Shishir Mehrotra, CEO of Grammarly's parent company Superhuman, about what happened.
A writer is suing #Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent
The Atlantic's Kaitlyn Tiffany explores Grammarly's controversial "Expert Review" feature, before it was shut down. She attempts to discover what it would be like to be edited by herself, what tweaks other famous writers would perhaps suggest and whether the creative writing industry should be concerned about being replaced.
Featured experts were outraged their likenesses were used without their consent. Others were specifically annoyed at the “anodyne” advice the borrowed identities were dishing out. Angwin, for one, told Wired she reviewed some of the suggestions only to be surprised “at how bad [the advice] was.”

Grammarly will face a class action lawsuit over its "Expert Review" feature that dispensed writing advice using the names of prominent journalists, academics, and authors, Wired reported on Wednesday. Technology journalist Julia Angwin is the only named plaintiff on the original filin…