NEW BIML Bibliography entry

https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03150

Position: Model Collapse Does Not Mean What You Think

Rylan Schaeffer, Joshua Kazdan, Alvan Caleb Arulandu, Sanmi Koyejo

We think recursive pollution is a better term than model collapse. Weak terminology leads to misunderstanding of impact. See figure 4. This is a very good paper.

#TOPPAPER #MLsec #RecursivePollution #DataPoisoning

https://berryvilleiml.com/references/

History teaches us the FBI is pretty good tracing people running manual DDoS attacks. To actually pull this off without getting busted, you'd need some angry engineers

There are plenty right now. With Google forcing mandatory verification and closing AOSP, many open-source devs feel cornered. They'd be the perfect candidates to slip a 'Trojan horse' right into their apps on the stores, maybe hidden inside a compromised open-source library. Devs could claim they just 'imported a library' without knowing it was poisoned

It's a supply chain attack: plausible deniability for the coders too. Users would just be 'victims' of malware, so no one gets arrested and age check and chat control will be unusable

I'm not an engineer though, so maybe I'm missing something. Just a thought for more elevated minds..

#SupplyChainAttack #CyberResistance #TrojanHorse #DDosTrojanHorse #DataPoisoning #STASI #ChatControl #AgeCheck #Privacy #DDos
#DigitalDisobedience #KGB #VirusTrojanHorse #DDosTrojanHorse

I see people thinking Linux or GrapheneOS will bypass chat control or age check. As seen with Ubuntu&CA's AB 1043, laws target OS providers. An "illegal" OS won't work: apps and browsers will demand the mandatory age signal, or the OS itself might block access to avoid fines. VPNs? Useless when USA, EU, and Canada etc enforce agechecks globally
If this madness passes, let's fight back and turn every device into a weapon of digital disobedience. Imagine an 'outlaw' OS mod appending a 'payload of forbidden words' (hidden in metadata) to every message
If millions sent these 'poisoned' messages, Chat Control would collapse under false positives
Risk: Could they brick our phones? Yes. But if millions get blocked simultaneously? Instant economic blackout. It's Mutually Assured Destruction: they can't ban everyone.
If everything is suspicious, nothing is

They scan for pedophiles but ignore #EpsteinFiles

#DataPoisoning #ChatControl #AgeCheck #Privacy #DDos #DigitalDisobedience #STASI #KGB

@catsalad

I've got an alternative idea if this madness actually goes through and we can't find a solution to circumvent it legally or not....

Instead of just running, let's turn every single phone into a weapon of digital disobedience.Imagine if an 'outlaw' OS (or a simple mod) automatically appended a 'bag of forbidden words' to every message, hidden in metadata or invisible text, containing a random mix of terms guaranteed to trigger the system.
If millions of people sent billions of these 'poisoned' messages, Chat Control would collapse under the sheer weight of false positives. It would be the biggest DDoS attack in history, powered purely by civil disobedience......

If everything is suspicious, nothing is.

#DDoS #FalsePositives #DataPoisoning #ChatContol #AgeVerification #AgeCheck

Apropos of content heists…

DIY anti-scraping movement, why bother blocking when you can’t win? Poison instead. https://alexschroeder.ch/view/2026-02-20-garbage

#webscraping #datapoisoning #aitraining #ai

"Kháng cự ngầm nhắm mục tiêu AI bằng phương pháp đầu độc dữ liệu nhằm phá hoại mô hình học máy. #AI #UndergroundResistance #DataPoisoning #AnTinMáy #ĐầuđộcAI"

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1qkfxlz/underground_resistance_aims_to_sabotage_ai_with/

Engineers Deploy “Poison Fountain” That Scrambles Brains of AI Systems

The Poison Fountain project calls on website owners to feed AI data scrapers a data set designed to sabotage AI models.

Futurism

NEW BIML Bibliography entry AND NEW TOP FIVE #MLsec PAPER

READ IT

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.07192

Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samples

Alexandra Souly, ... Nicholas Carlini, et al

Excellent paper, clear and well-stated (like all Carlini papers). This result shows that recursive pollution risk is even greater than we thought. Injecting backdoors is pretty easy. The examples are a bit simplistic.

#TOPPAPER #MLsec #Attacks #DataPoisoning

https://berryvilleiml.com/references/

[Publication] From Human to Binary and Back: On the Need to Explain and Understand Digital Machines in the Humanities

The issue vol. 5 no. 1 (2025), titled “Human-Centred AI in the Translation Industry. Questions on Ethics, Creativity and Sustainability”, of the Yearbook of Translational Hermeneutics is out. It is edited by prof. Katharina Walter and prof. Marco Agnetta, and it includes my article “From Human to Binary and Back: On the Need to Explain and Understand Digital Machines in the Humanities“, a paper that I first presented at the conference “Creativity and Translation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” at the University of Innsbruck in January 2024.

As the editors write in the introduction, “from different perspectives, the contributions gathered here aim to prevent the discussion on AI from being reduced to questions of technical feasibility. Instead, they frame the de-bate on AI as a profoundly human and societal one”.

In the article I argue that we need to deepen our knowledge of the digital machines we use and to develop critical approaches in our research, translation and creative practices, highlighting theoretical-practical uses from a socio-technical perspective.

Here is the abstract:

This article aims to bring attention to some usually overlooked aspects of the relationship between humans and complex digital technologies. Before engaging with artificial intelligence (AI), it is indeed pivotal to address some key questions about it. Specifically, I will try to focus on our ability to understand how AI technologies work and determine creative and critical uses we can make of them. To do so, I will first discuss problems associated with using the current definitions of AI and suggest that we should make a creative effort to re-translate these terms in order to find better-suited expressions. I will call attention to the need for a different kind of translation, which negotiates between what machines do and what we can understand about them, because one of the biggest challenges of machine learning is to make the internal processes explainable and understandable for us humans. I will close with elaborations on some creative forms of interaction with language models and image models which support artists, writers and creators (who do not want to see their work stolen by AI crawlers and used to train datasets), with the overall goal of building an ethical, critical and sustainable relationship between humans and digital machines.

#AI #algorithmicSabotage #antiComputing #artificialIntelligence #dataPoisoning #digitalHumanities #KatharinaWalter #MarcoAgnetta #translation #YearbookOfTranslationalHermeneutics

https://wp.me/pa8vBQ-nW

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Human-Centred AI in the Translation Industry. Questions on Ethics, Creativity and Sustainability | Yearbook of Translational Hermeneutics