Gladwyn d’Souzahttps://www.democracynow.org/2023/8/15/ralph_nader_donald_trump_indictments
A glaring #omission in the #JackSmith charges: the #QuanceIndicted should be additionally charged under #Section3 of the #FourteenthAmendment, which could bar him from again running for political office due to having “engaged in %insurrection or #rebellion”
#Jan6 #usethe14th
Why No Insurrection Charge? Ralph Nader on How Trump Could Still Be Reelected Unless <span class="caps">DOJ</span> Acts
Ralph Nader, the longtime consumer advocate, corporate critic and former presidential candidate, discusses “serial law violator” Donald Trump’s criminal indictments, particularly the second federal case brought by special prosecutor Jack Smith that accuses Trump of conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and of inciting the January 6 attack on Capitol Hill. Nader says there is a glaring omission in the charges, and says Trump should be additionally charged under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which could bar him from again running for political office due to having “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States.
Shawn Smith Peirce