MY VLOG: Return of Titans to Afghanistan| Will the US be targeted by terrorists with their own equipment?

https://youtu.be/2AXnrZxQQSs

US want to repossess Bagram Airbase. How will this work for the terrorist outfits operating from Afghanistan? Will the US military equipment left behind be used against them? Its a loaded situation. Can the US role expand in future?

 #afghanistan #bagram #usa #militarypower #alqaida #ttp #other #china #miitarystrategy

Return of Titans to Afghanistan| Will the US be targeted by terrorists with their own equipment?

YouTube
When does Cleveland Cavaliers vs Indiana Pacers NBA playoffs series start? - NBA

It's on to the Eastern Conference semifinals for the second year running for the Indiana Pacers.

NBA
Our unique CTI platform provides predictive indicators. Be one step ahead! https://vuldb.com/?kb.cti #vuldb #cti #ioc #ttp #ioa #predictive
Cyber Threat Intelligence

Number one vulnerability management and threat intelligence platform documenting and explaining vulnerabilities since 1970.

Knicks vs Pistons schedule Game 5: Time, channel, streaming - NBA

Ben Wallace, Rip Hamilton get standing ovations from Pistons fans

NBA
Detroit Red Wings draft picks in 2025 NHL Draft - NHL

Red Wings currently hold nine draft picks in 2025, including two in the third round.

NHL

WaPo’s Report About Terrorists’ Use Of US-Sourced Afghan Arms Against Pakistan Is Misleading

WaPo’s Report About Terrorists’ Use Of US-Sourced Afghan Arms Against Pakistan Is Misleading

By Andrew Korybko

The Pakistani Establishment shares some blame for the latest terrorist upsurge together with America and the Taliban to differing degrees, yet WaPo avoided drawing attention to this for reasons that can only be speculated.

The Washington Post (WaPo) published a detailed report last week about how “U.S. weapons from Afghan war give Pakistani militants a deadly advantage”, which claimed that some of the US-designated terrorists behind last month’s hijacking of the Jaffar Express used such arms during this infamous attack. They allegedly obtained them from the Taliban and the Pakistani borderland bazaars where they’ve supposedly been sold for the last 3,5 years. There’s no reason to doubt any of the three aforesaid claims.

What’s misleading though is the subtext throughout the piece that these American arms and the Taliban alone are responsible for the upsurge in terrorism across Pakistan. Weapons don’t cause terrorism, people do, either because bad actors exploit their poverty, they’re ideologically radicalized, and/or bent on revenge due to personal disputes, their family having been harmed or killed, or real or perceived injustices. None of this justifies terrorism, to be absolutely clear, but it contextualizes the root causes.

They’re not even remotely touched upon by WaPo, however, with it simply being taken for granted that terrorist attacks are occurring for whatever reason. Their report also only makes casual mention of how Pakistan was once accused of sheltering Taliban leaders, which is deliberately deceitful because it was also actually accused of arming the Taliban and facilitating the then-insurgent group’s logistics. The Taliban couldn’t have returned to power without Pakistan’s help over the two decades prior.

These facts don’t imply that Pakistan expected the Taliban to then arm anti-Pakistani terrorists for ideological and strategic reasons even though some earlier warned about that possibility, nor that Pakistan deserves what happened, but reminding readers about them more fairly divides the blame. On that topic, WaPo also didn’t question how so many arms were able to be smuggled into Pakistan despite Islamabad knowing what the Taliban captured, nor why they were sold openly in bazaars for so long.

These observations lead to the uncomfortable conclusion that the Pakistani Establishment, which refers to the country’s powerful armed forces and intelligence services that wield much more control over policy than the civilian government, is either incompetent and/or corrupt. They’ve practically sealed the border shut with India so much so that rarely does anything get through to Pakistan without their knowledge, however, so incompetence probably isn’t the issue.

Corruption is therefore the most logistical conclusion and it’s proven to have very serious national security consequences in the sense of facilitating, but importantly not being directly responsible for, the recent upsurge in terrorism since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan. Elaborating on this, some officials might have been bribed to let these arms illegally enter Pakistan while others could have wanted to profit from these sales, but the Establishment could have put a quick stop to this if it really wanted to.

This didn’t happen even after signs of an impending terrorist upsurge were seen from mid-2022 onward, which coincides with them redirecting their institutions’ focus towards suppressing the political opposition instead of remaining committed to ensuring their country’s national security interests. The Pakistani Establishment therefore shares some blame for this together with America and the Taliban to differing degrees, yet WaPo avoided drawing attention to that for reasons that can only be speculated.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.

7 Courses in 1 – Diploma in Business Management

#AfghanTaliban #Afghanistan #Pakistan #PakistanArmy #TehrikITalibanPakistan #Terrorism #Terrorists #TTP #USA

Search Results for “Andrew Korybko” – Voice of East

پیامِ مشرق

Voice of East

MY VLOG: US javelin missiles in hands of Fitna-ul-Khawarij| When will it be used against Pakistan?

https://youtu.be/rNNdmsxHijc

Fitna-ul-Khawarij acquire javelin missiles: deadly and technologically most advanced. Can Pakistan counter? When will it be used against Pakistan? 

#ttp #missilestrike #army #pakistan #terrorism #terrorism #afghanistan

US javelin missiles in hands of Fitna-ul-Khawarij| When will it be used against Pakistan?

YouTube

MY VLOG: US javelin missiles in hands of Fitna-ul-Khawarij| When will it be used against Pakistan?

https://youtu.be/rNNdmsxHijc

Fitna-ul-Khawarij acquire javelin missiles: deadly and technologically most advanced. Can Pakistan counter? When will it be used against Pakistan? 

#ttp #missilestrike #army #pakistan #terrorism #terrorism #afghanistan

US javelin missiles in hands of Fitna-ul-Khawarij| When will it be used against Pakistan?

YouTube
Our GitHub repository provides a wide variety of IOC for CTI: https://github.com/vuldb/cyber_threat_intelligence #vuldb #github #cti #ioc #ttp #ioa
GitHub - vuldb/cyber_threat_intelligence: Cyber Threat Intelligence Data, Indicators, and Analysis

Cyber Threat Intelligence Data, Indicators, and Analysis - vuldb/cyber_threat_intelligence

GitHub

Addressing Strategic Risks in US-Pakistan Critical Mineral Cooperation

Addressing Strategic Risks in US-Pakistan Critical Mineral Cooperation

By Andrew Korybko

Pakistan might be handing the US a poisoned chalice.

The US sent one of its top diplomats for South Asia to attend the Pakistan Minerals Investment Forum in Islamabad last week, during which time he conveyed the Trump Administration’s interest in critical mineral cooperation with Pakistan and met with senior political and military officials to discuss this. These resources are integral to the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and that’s why the US is negotiating such partnerships across the world with countries as varied as Ukraine, the Congo, and now Pakistan.

Each of these three entail strategic risks, but it’s only the last one that will be discussed in this analysis. To begin with, the bulk of Pakistan’s mineral resources are located in its Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces, which are respectively suffering terrorist insurgencies waged by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). The former is fighting to impose a radical Islamic dictatorship, the latter wants independence, and both are designated by the US as terrorists.

  • Accordingly, the first strategic risk that critical mineral cooperation with Pakistan entails is that these groups target American companies and nationals in these two regions. This is a plausible scenario since the BLA in particular is infamous for targeting Chinese workers, who they accuse of extracting their region’s wealth. As for the TTP, it’s waging war against the partially US-armed Pakistani state. Both groups are therefore expected to consider American companies and nationals to be legitimate targets.
  • The second strategic risk builds upon the first and relates to the US being convinced by Pakistan that the aforesaid threats to its mining companies could be mitigated through preferential arms deals. The Trump Administration would do well to think twice about that though since Pakistan’s much more significant arms relationship with China hasn’t made its workers any safer and perceived American favouritism of Pakistan by India could complicate their ties upon which a lot of the US’ “Pivot (back) to Asia” depends.
  • Segueing into the third strategic risk, Pakistan might be offering the US critical mineral cooperation at this time not only to cause trouble in Indo-US ties, but also to relieve reported pressure upon its ruling military establishment by the America First faction. They believe that civilian-led democratic rule would facilitate the main anti-Chinese goal of the US’ “Pivot (back) to Asia” as explained here so the ruling military establishment that stands to lose from this might be trying to buy them off with a mineral deal.
  • The fourth strategic risk is that Pakistan doesn’t comply with whatever strings the US might attach to a mineral deal in exchange for relieving pressure upon its military rulers. For instance, they might agree to distance Pakistan in some way from China, logistically facilitate mineral exports from Afghanistan if the US clinches a similar such deal there, and/or allow CIA drone bases for spying on and threatening Iran. It’s possible that these would just be false promises to secure a deal and enrich corrupt military officials.
  • And finally, the last strategic risk is that the US gets embroiled in another “War on Terror” if “mission creep” leads to it fighting the TTP and BLA with Pakistan in order to secure its mineral investments. The “sunk-cost fallacy” could also play a role in these calculations too. Coupled with potential complications in Indo-US ties and the derailing of the US’ “Pivot (back) to Asia”, the strategic costs of critical mineral cooperation with Pakistan could far outweigh the expected benefits, thus making it a poisoned chalice.
  • Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.

    7 Courses in 1 – Diploma in Business Management

    #BLA #Geopolitics #Pakistan #PakistanArmy #TTP #USA

    Search Results for “Andrew Korybko” – Voice of East

    پیامِ مشرق

    Voice of East