https://stayingalive.in/cataloguing-strategic-innov/alignment-is-not-meetings.html
OKRs create a measurable picture of what βbetterβ actually means.
Read more π https://lttr.ai/ArRWt
It's always wild to me how rare it is for organizations to define the terms they use in strategy and goal setting. If you ask 100 people what strategy means, you're going to get 100 different answers.
Having a documented, shared strategy and goal language reduces confusion and increases alignment.
Read the full article: WTF are OKRs?
βΈ https://lttr.ai/AqIg8
A strong OKR practice connects vision to daily decisions and labor.
Thatβs how strategy becomes real for people -- when it helps them make decisions about how to invest their time + energy AND helps them decide what *not* to do.
Read the full article: WTF are OKRs?
βΈ https://lttr.ai/AqhEO
OKRs bring consistency to how progress is defined and evaluated, and consistency builds trust.
Read more in my freshly updated WTF are OKRs post (with video!) π https://lttr.ai/AqfiT
In a lot of organizations, OKRs are about numbers and charts and graphs on a dashboard, and often theyβre implemented because senior leadership wants more visibility into the organizationβs progress.
But OKRs can be *so much more*
Have you ever heard of the 70/20/10 model?
Your 70%? Run-the-business work: known knowns, mandatories, milestones, delivery commitments. Completion is success. That belongs in delivery planning, not your OKRs.
Your 20% and 10%? That's where OKRs live. Work where mere completion isn't success.
One question makes the call: Is completion success?
If yes? That's delivery work, and it needs a plan.
If no? That's where key results come in.

The median $3M-$20M company that hires strategy consultants spends $150K-$500K over six to twelve months developing market positioning frameworks and resource allocation strategies that never get implemented. The cause is not the quality of the strategic work: it is the absence of execution infrastr