Edited because: This isn’t updated with recent numbers but the wastewater link in the replies is good. Sorry I didn’t realize . . . I was just so excited to see a number lower than 3% for the first time in six years I needed to blast it out to everyone. But I was wrong dammit.

This is pretty great. I hope it’s accurate.

It says the Covid positivity rate in Connecticut is below 3% now.

If this is accurate this is the first time I’ve seen the Covid positivity rate hit 3% since the beginning. And I’m really bitter about it because I remember the lockdowns were supposed to happen until we got below 5% and it never happened here in New Hampshire anyway.

#connecticut #CovidTracker #PositivityRate
#yale

https://yalemaps.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/3ef51fd44a894370a704216904c7155b

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

@mike_honey_ A thank you from France where your post #Eris is shared by #LePoint #NathanJoubioux
But without giving either the #incidence rate, or the #positivityrate (measurement of screening sabotage) or therefore the #TestsPerConfirmedCase, the main indicator of the eradication effort
https://twitter.com/LePoint/status/1688972603648811011
Le Point on Twitter

“Covid-19 : le variant Eris fait remonter le nombre de contaminations en France https://t.co/WIkvdnIzZl”

Twitter