Code-Coverage with PCOV in a mono-repo

Today I finally managed to find and fix an issue that we had for some time with Code-Coverage generation with PCOV in github actions.

To give you a bit of background, imagine a project that uses 2 separate folders where one contains the business-logic and one contains the framework-related code. The framework-related part contains a lot of integration and end-to-end test that – of course – also use and therefore test the business-logic.

Every PullRequest runs the tests both from the bunsiness-logic part as well as from the framework-related part. And to give the developers feedback how well the changed code is covered with tests we collect coverage data and generate a patch-coverage report. I wrote about that some time back. So we now get a comment each in the PR that contains the untested lines in the business-logic related part and the framework-related part respectively.

That worked flawlessly for the business-logic related part as those were mostly unit-tests that do not rely upon the framework-related code.

The framework-related part though didn’t work that great. It always showed the business-logic related parts as untested even though I knew they were tested.

So… Why?

After some digging I realized that there is a difference in how the coverage is created between Xdebug and pcov – yes! There is obviously a difference as those are different tools. But there is also a difference in what is included in the reports.

And today I figured out what it was and why it broke our proces in our specific setup in GitHub actions.

For a start: We have our code in two folders: business and framework.

We also have a framework/phpunit.xml file that contains this code:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><phpunit xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="https://schema.phpunit.de/12.1/phpunit.xsd" processIsolation="false" stopOnFailure="false" > <coverage/> <source> <include> <directory>src</directory> <directory>../business/src</directory> </include> </source> </phpunit>

So coverage shall be collected from the current src folder as well as from the business/src folder.

This works as expected when you run phpunit with Xdebug as coverage-generator.

With pcov as coverage-generator it worked locally as expected.

But not in our GitHub Actions…

Enter pcov.directory

After a bit of digging I learned that there is the pcov.directory ini-setting that determines which code is considered for coverage. So I tested my GitHub Actions by adding some test-code like this:

jobs: tests: steps: - name: "Checkout" uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6 with: ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} - name: "Install PHP" uses: shivammathur/setup-php@44454db4f0199b8b9685a5d763dc37cbf79108e1 # v2 with: extensions: "intl, pdo_mysql, zip, imap, xml, soap, apcu, redis" php-version: "8.4" coverage: "pcov" - name: "check pcov.directory" run: | php -i | grep pcov

Running this in GitHub Actions provided me with output similar to this:

Run php -i | grep pcov /etc/php/8.4/cli/conf.d/20-pcov.ini, pcov pcov.directory => /home/runner/work/<org-name>/<repo-name> pcov.exclude => none pcov.initial.memory => 65336 bytes pcov.initial.files => 64

/home/runner/work/<org-name>/<repo-name> was exactly what i expected! So why the heck does it seemingly not work?

After some more testing I realized that I was at one point doing a cd framework before running PHPUnit.

- name: "Run tests" run: | cd framework vendor/phpunit/phpunit/phpunit --coverage-php /tmp/${{ github.sha }}_coverage.cov

Should that cause some issues?

So I added the php -i | grep pcov after the PHPUnit run like this:

- name: "Run tests" run: | cd framework vendor/phpunit/phpunit/phpunit --coverage-php /tmp/${{ github.sha }}_coverage.cov php -i | grep pcov

And what was that? Suddenly I got

pcov.directory => /home/runner/work/<org-name>/<repo-name>/framework/src

🤯

Suddenly the pcov directory was set to something totally different. And with that setting it was clear that I couldn’t get what I expected as now only content from framework/src/ would be considered as covered. And everything from the business folder was not considered for coverage.

So the only question left was whether that was something happening deep in PHPUnits logic or just based on changing the directory.

Long story short: It’s just based on the change directory. In essence setup-php sets up pcov so that the current folder is considered as pcov.directory. As pcov itself adds src when that folder is available that explains the changed folder.

But is there a way to change that? To use a fixed folder despite the current working directory being changed?

Yes! There is.

I added ini-values: "pcov.directory=$GITHUB_WORKSPACE" to the setup-php directive like this:

- name: "Install PHP" uses: shivammathur/setup-php@44454db4f0199b8b9685a5d763dc37cbf79108e1 # v2 with: extensions: "intl, pdo_mysql, zip, imap, xml, soap, apcu, redis" ini-values: "pcov.directory=$GITHUB_WORKSPACE" php-version: "8.4" coverage: "pcov"

And all of a sudden the pcov.directory stayed regardless of where I changed the working directory to.

And so with this little change I was again able to get the coverage-data from the business folder whenever i run tests in the framework folder.

Helpful links:

#coverage #pcov #php #phpunit
Increase code coverage successively » andreas.heigl.org

increase code coverage successively by setting up incrementally improving code coverage for legacy code via patch coverage checks

andreas.heigl.org

#PCov extension v1.0.12 was released, which fixes #PHP 8.4 compatibility. You can again use PCov for collecting code coverage in the newest PHP version 😍.

https://github.com/krakjoe/pcov/releases/tag/v1.0.12

Release v1.0.12 · krakjoe/pcov

Release 1.0.12

GitHub

Bit of a shame that #pcov seems to be unmaintained. It's (or was, I guess) my favourite #PHP code coverage provider.

It looks like XDebug has improved a bunch in the meantime tho...

Over the last few months, I've been asked time and again:

"Sebastian, which PHP extension do you use to collect code coverage data?"

This question may sound simple, but to answer it I'm afraid I need to elaborate a little ...

https://thephp.cc/articles/pcov-or-xdebug?ref=mastodon

#php #xdebug #pcov #phpunit

PCOV or Xdebug? | The PHP Consulting Company

Should you use PCOV or Xdebug to collect code coverage data? Sebastian Bergmann gives a personal answer.

Last week, replaced #pcov with #xdebug as I got segfaults. Now I get segfaults with xdebug. I guess I should give up generating coverage in CI. 🙈. At least I am now experienced on getting coredumps or using gdb for a backtrace🤣