University of North Carolina moves to define academic freedom – Asheville Citizen-Times

EDUCATION

UNC System moves to define academic freedom, battles profs union

By Clayton Henkel, NC Newline, Asheville Citizen Times, Jan. 30, 2026, 6:04 a.m. ET

The UNC Systems’ Committee on University Governance gave an initial nod Wednesday to a formal definition for academic freedom.

“Academic freedom as a concept is included in our code and has been for some time,” explained Andrew Tripp, UNC System’s senior vice president and general counsel. “What has been lacking is a definition of academic freedom for both faculty and students.”

Tripp said university leadership identified that gap over a year ago and tasked the chair of UNC’s Faculty Assembly and others to work out a consensus definition that could govern how university campuses operate.

“It does a couple of things — that definition defines [academic freedom] in words that our faculty assembly have provided, but it also talks about what academic freedom is with concrete examples and where it applies most pointedly to protect the classroom and course development, research, and scholarly inquiry,” Tripp said.

The proposed policy also defines what academic freedom isn’t, which is important to acknowledge, Tripp told members of the Board of Governors.

“I think it’s a good balance of what the responsibilities we have are and what the opportunities we have are, because academic freedom is critical to us using our expertise to do the teaching and research the faculty are supposed to do,” Maki said.

The policy defines academic freedom as “the foundational principle that protects the rights of all faculty to engage in teaching, research/creative activities, service, and scholarly inquiry without undue influence. It ensures that faculty can freely pursue knowledge; express, discuss and debate ideas; and contribute to knowledge and understanding related to their areas of expertise.”

The policy further states that faculty have the rights and responsibility to determine “pedagogical strategies, instructional materials, evaluation methods, and classroom discourse that supports student learning” provided those methods align with professional standards.

But the policy also cautions that academic freedom is not absolute.

Under the policy, faculty are expected to exercise academic freedom that falls “within the parameters established by academic disciplines, professions, and in compliance with institutional policies and rules.”

Other guardrails spell out that academic freedom does not permit instructors to teach content “clearly unrelated” to the course description or to use university resources for political or ideological advocacy.

The North Carolina State Conference of the American Association of University Professors says that proposed revisions to the policy differ considerably from language adopted in the UNC Faculty Assembly’s Resolution on Academic Freedom back in October 2025.  What started as six lines defining the limitations of academic freedom last fall mushroomed to 35 lines when presented this week.

“That’s a really big increase, and that increase was not done in a way that was presented with shared governance, but that increase was done with very little faculty input over the holiday break when very little faculty were even available to weigh in,” said Annelise Mennicke, a AAUP member and associate professor in the School of Social Work at UNC-Charlotte.

Attorneys for NCAAUP say the list of parameters effectively weakens the historical scope of academic freedom.

“Much of the language in the Resolution and proposed additional language is also vague and, therefore, risks creating an academic environment that is inconsistent with principles of academic freedom and free speech articulated by the United States Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit,” NCAAUP attorneys write in a January 26 letter to the UNC System.

Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: University of North Carolina moves to define academic freedom

#AcademicFreedom #AshevilleCitizenTimes #Define #Definitions #January302026 #NCNewsline #NCAAUP #UNC #UNCChapelHill #UNCCharlotte #UniversityOfNorthCarolina #VagueLanguage

UNC System details painstaking process to root out diversity, equity and inclusion  – NC Newsline

UNC Chapel Hill (Photo: Clayton Henkel / NC Newsline)

    UNC System details painstaking process to root out diversity, equity and inclusion 

    By: Clayton Henkel – January 8, 2026 9:00 am

    The University of North Carolina System assured state legislators Wednesday that they are doing everything in their power to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion language and programs across the 17-campus system.

    The UNC Board of Governors voted in May 2024 to formally repeal the system’s policy on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in favor of “principled neutrality.”

    Still, equity has remained in the political crosshairs, with Republicans lawmakers filing multiple bills in the 2025 session to  prohibit the support, funding or implementation of DEI programs in state government and education.

    Bart Goodson, the UNC System’s senior vice president for government affairs, told members of the House Select Committee on Government Efficiency that the system is ahead of the curve in complying with the President’s executive orders on discrimination and DEI. (Photo: NCGA livestream)

    Bart Goodson, the UNC System’s senior vice president for government affairs, told members of the House Select Committee on Government Efficiency that by the time President Trump’s executive orders on discrimination and DEI rolled out in January 2025, the system was ahead of the curve.

    Goodson said each campus was advised on the remaining steps necessary to bring campuses into full compliance with the Trump administration’s orders.

    “The guidance emphasizes the policies refocus on student success and reminds campuses of the constant, ongoing vigilance campuses must use,” said Goodson.

    UNC Chapel Hill (Photo: Clayton Henkel/NC Newsline)

    A memo from the system also mandated that all general education requirements that included completion of course credits related to diversity, equity and inclusion be suspended.

    The system further mandated an annual campus reporting requirement with the chancellor’s signature to verify compliance.

    To date, 59 positions tied to DEI have been eliminated and 131 have been realigned. The system estimates that the implementation of the equality policy across the University of North Carolina system has saved $17.1 million. The savings have been redirected to student mental health, military and veteran student services and academic advising, according to Goodson.

    But efforts to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion from higher education in North Carolina have not been quick or easy.

    “We’re turning over every stone,” Goodson told committee members.

    The campuses have manually reviewed more than 4,756 web pages, revised 1,270 web pages, and reviewed over 8,000 gifts, including scholarships and grants. Of those gift funds, 345 were flagged, 29 amended, with some spending paused. Funding from 85 foundations required working with individual donors to bring agreements into compliance.

    “It takes a lot of manpower and a lot of man hours to review this information,” Goodson told the committee. “It’s a time-consuming area.”

    Continue/Read Original Article Here: UNC System details painstaking process to root out diversity, equity and inclusion  • NC Newsline

    #PrincipledNeutrality #131Realigned #17Campuses #59PositionsEliminated #DEI #Diversity #Equity #ExecutiveOrders #FundingAdjustments #Inclusion #NCNewsline #Process #StateGovernment #TheUniversityOfNorthCarolina #Trump #UNC #UNCChapelHill
    NC Newsline
    #NCNewsline