Today's Money Stuff column (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-11-24/leave-the-gold-in-the-ground) includes a Canadian company attempting to tokenize unmined gold:
"If you have a certain type of mind, or if you own a marginal gold mine, you might get to thinking that it is a bit wasteful — and environmentally destructive — to dig gold ore out of the ground, refine the ore into gold, form it into shiny bars of pure gold, and then stick it back underground so that people can trade electronic database entries entitling them to the gold. Why not leave it underground, skip all the other steps and just trade the database entries? If you own a gold mine, you can with reasonable confidence certify how much gold you have underground. That gold is there, in, uh, almost the same sense that the gold at the New York Fed is there. You could just go ahead and sell entitlements to it, without digging it up."
And while there's something not quite right about this -- people who want tokens can just buy tokens without the assay? -- I fully support "leave the gold in the ground instead of wreaking environmental destruction to mine it and then re-bury it."
On the other hand, paying people _not_ to mine gold is not quite the thing either.
What would the proper set of social incentives look like to not mine gold that will end up buried in a vault anyway? Precious metals asset tax, anyone?
#MoneyStuff #GoldMining