The FSF considers large language models
On the interaction between free-software licensing and large language models.
The FSF considers large language models
On the interaction between free-software licensing and large language models.
Upgrade to #GPLv4?
Nothing wrong with #GPLv3, but I feel it does need to be updated to specifically make it unlawful to put the code on any repository owned or operated by an entity that is engaging in software theft (eg. Micros(ha)ft servers). That means no code on git-hub(dot) com.... includes forks and mirrors obviously.
Microsoft supports #softwareTheft via their so-called "ai".
(NOTE: The new license wouldn't need to add anything about "AI" because the existing license is clear, but it probably should explicitly name micros(ha)ft as barred for the sake of clarity.)
@landley yeah...
Worse is only #AssholeLicensing like #AGPLv3 or #SSPL at which point one might just choose some #commercial #SourceAvailable solution (like #Tarsnap is) instead...
#GPLv3 is mostly #Stallmanism and a complete disregard to practicality and the fact that #CCSS exists!
I'd not be surprised if #GPLv4 extends #Copyleft upon all forms of output and input as well as sentencing violators to sponsor/contribute to #GnuHurd as an "indulgence trade"...
And yes, #Stallmanists and #RMS himself rambling ideological nonsense and shoehorning it into a license aka. #GPLv2 and espechally #GPLv3 killed #Copyleft and inspired Assholes to go with #SSPL aka. the "You can't make money off it, but worse!" license.
I mean what's next?
#AGPLv4 which demands #LicensingFees to #upstream projects in proportion to the sales price of the product [like #ARM wants nowadays] or #GPLv4 which demands #ForcedLabour on #GnuHurd for violations?