KlankyI took Charlie Puth's AI music class so you don't have to - YouTube
SahwaThe New York Times drops freelance journalist who used AI to write book review
Metin Seven 🎨I've recently summed up my thoughts on generative "AI" on my homepage. Here's a screenshot of that section.
#tech #technology #BigTech #IT #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #LLM #LLMs #ML #MachineLearning #GenAI #generativeAI #AIAgent #AISlop #FuckAI #Fuck_AI #enshittification #microslop #microsoft #copilot #meta #google #NVIDIA #gemini #OpenAI #ChatGPT #anthropic #claude
bridgeenjoyerThought of this today
Thought of this today - sh.itjust.works
OK, it would still be immensely stupid, a waste of resources and land, and probably not even work properly at all - but for a moment, imagine if devs/companies used ai to optimize their games/software/websites. That seems like something it should be used for, if we were in a Star Trek universe. Anyway back to reality, here’s your ad for SlopCoke!
ArtworkI used AI. It worked. I hated it.
I used AI. It worked. I hated it. - Lemmy.World
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/48191305 [https://programming.dev/post/48191305] > Or maybe that’s just me. I’ve been writing code for a good chunk of my life now. I find deep joy in the struggle of creation. I want to keep doing it, even if it’s slower. Even if it’s worse. I want to keep writing code. But I suspect not everyone feels that way about it. Are they wrong? Or can different people find different value in the same task? And what does society owe to those who enjoy an older way of doing things? > > If I could disinvent this technology, I would. My experiences, while enlightening as to models’ capabilities, have not altered my belief that they cause more harm than good. And yet, I have no plan on how to destroy generative AI. I don’t think this is a technology we can put back in the box. It may not take the same form a year from now; it may not be as ubiquitous or as celebrated, but it will remain. > > And in the realm of software development, its presence fundamentally changes the nature of the trade. We must learn how to exist in a world where some will choose to use these tools, whether responsibly or not. Is it possible to distinguish one from the other? Is it possible to renounce all code not written by human hands? > > https://taggart-tech.com/reckoning [https://web.archive.org/web/20260402210313/https://taggart-tech.com/reckoning/] [web-archive]
RE: https://social.heise.de/@heiseonlineenglish/116336858264050422
Meta’s new elite enshittification team…
#meta #facebook #tech #technology #BigTech #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #FuckAI #fuck_ai #AISlop #LLM #LLMs
Failed AI tractor company lays off all employees after burning $240M, abandons Bay Area headquarters
Vibe Password Generation: Predictable by Design
Vibe Password Generation: Predictable by Design - Divisions by zero
>LLM-generated passwords (generated directly by the LLM, rather than by an agent using a tool) appear strong, but are fundamentally insecure, because LLMs are designed to predict tokens – the opposite of securely and uniformly sampling random characters.
Almost Half of US Data Centers That Were Supposed to Open This Year Slated to Be Canceled or Delayed
sgibson5150