Waiting for the handyman.
Reading a paper on analyzing firn in Antarctica. Firn is the snow layer before it gets compacted to actual ice. The firn layer contains gas like methane or CO2, too, but the air bubbles aren't strictly sorted on input date π The bubbles can be older or younger than their immediate surrounding. (True for real ice layers, too.)
All very interesting.
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/3383/2019/tc-13-3383-2019.html
"Multi-tracer study of gas trapping in an East Antarctic ice core" by Kevin #Fourteau et al 2019.
The absolute shocking byproduct of their incredibly thorough work is a 2700 year data series for CH4 in MONTHLY resolution!! https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.909627?format=html#download
From -930 to 1774 AD.
Their gas dating method is so exact that they pinpoint several different days for every month, too.
I am stunned that monthly resolution is possible. And this was merely a byproduct of figuring out the best way to analyze firn.
#paleoclimate #methane #CH4 #firn #icecore #ice #snow #Antarctica
Multi-tracer study of gas trapping in an East Antarctic ice core
Abstract. We study a firn and ice core drilled at the new βLock-Inβ site in East Antarctica, located 136βkm away from Concordia station towards Dumont d'Urville. High-resolution chemical and physical measurements were performed on the core, with a particular focus on the trapping zone of the firn where air bubbles are formed. We measured the air content in the ice, closed and open porous volumes in the firn, firn density, firn liquid conductivity, major ion concentrations, and methane concentrations in the ice. The closed and open porosity volumes of firn samples were obtained using the two independent methods of pycnometry and tomography, which yield similar results. The measured increase in the closed porosity with density is used to estimate the air content trapped in the ice with the aid of a simple gas-trapping model. Results show a discrepancy, with the model trapping too much air. Experimental errors have been considered but do not explain the discrepancy between the model and the observations. The model and data can be reconciled with the introduction of a reduced compression of the closed porosity compared to the open porosity. Yet, it is not clear if this limited compression of closed pores is the actual mechanism responsible for the low amount of air in the ice. High-resolution density measurements reveal the presence of strong layering, manifesting itself as centimeter-scale variations. Despite this heterogeneous stratification, all layers, including the ones that are especially dense or less dense compared to their surroundings, display similar pore morphology and closed porosity as a function of density. This implies that all layers close in a similar way, even though some close in advance or later compared to the bulk firn. Investigation of the chemistry data suggests that in the trapping zone, the observed stratification is partly related to the presence of chemical impurities.