@rozeboosje worse even: There ain't any exemptions from the #CSAM ban, so legally speaking the moment some @Bundesregierung employee or any user from #Germany sees said CSAM on any platform they are legally liable for that unless they literally turn themselves in as withness to the #police.

• That's how #Zensursula and her fans got any #critics of her #InternetCensorship plans (i.e. #Tauss) raided indirectly…

But then again #Police refuse to even siphon off all the #URLs from #pedo #forums they seized and order the #Filehosters to not only hand them over a copy of the files & access logs, deleting the original and setup a #Honeypot to #log all future attempts of #reupload and/or #download for them.

• They shure as hell could do that, and legally they have to (just as they have to arrest and ID every #NonviolentOffender of actual #VictimlessCrimes [CSAM certainly isn't victimless!] by law), but they chose not to…

@kkarhan translation: "It's not an #impossibility, but rather an #unwillingness to #delete!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndk0nfppc_k

But I think it's wrong on principle, because the "additional profit" of catching perpetrators with "well-known abuse material" isn't really worth much more.

Just having a user account in a #pedo forum can be considered "membership in a criminal organization" (because that was the thinking behind the persecution of Xplosives.net users)...

The only thing that helps is #DeleteInsteadOfBlocking...
Otherwise, hardly anyone will complain about the #sabotage, quite the opposite!

Most #filehosters automatically add #CSAM to their own "#ContentID" #filter based on the checksum (SHA-1 + MD5 to rule out possible collisions), and when the same file is reuploaded, they sometimes automatically notify law enforcement authorities based on the uploading IP address and block accounts.

Even *"#Darknet" search engines are kicking out pedo sites!"