9/

The authors [4] define "the strategic and coordinated malicious manipulation of society’s evidence base" as "evidence hacking". I'd prefer the term "#EvidenceCracking" or "#EvidenceSubversion", as #hacking ("Playfully doing something difficult, whether useful or not" [5]) is a very misleading term for this.

Instead, it migth recall the idea by C. Grimsley of "pseudo-hacking" as radical denaturing [6] "which superficially resemble hacking but lack the necessary sensitivity to social context"