Have Pen, Laptop, and ChatGPT, Will Publish (guest post) – Daily Nous

Home, Writing

Have Pen, Laptop, and ChatGPT, Will Publish (guest post)

By Justin Weinberg. January 19, 2026 at 9:00 am

How, as a researcher, can you use AI tools like ChatGPT in a way that doesn’t compromise your integrity, creativity, and independence?

In the following guest post, Jimmy Alfonso Licon (Arizona State University) explains how he does it, laying out how he approaches his writing process and the roles he assigns ChatGPT in it.

As Dr. Licon describes it, his “resulting workflow is neither purely human nor AI-written.”

Those who make use of AI in their research and writing are encouraged to share their methods and processes in the comments. Also of particular interest is how human-AI “hybrid” works should be treated, institutionally (by journals, universities). Discussion welcome.

(A version of this piece first appeared at Dr. Licon’s newsletter, Uncommon Wisdom.)

[“Human Hang-Up Machine” by Agnes Denes]

Have Pen, Laptop, and ChatGPT, Will Publish
or How I Use AI Without Sacrificing Creativity and Independence,
by Jimmy Alfonso Licon

People sometimes imagine writing as a flash of inspiration, a heroic sprint at the keyboard, and then a finished paper. My own process is considerably less cinematic and much more modular. It involves a pile of printed articles, a pen, a computer, and a large language model. Each plays a specific role. And together, they help me turn a half-formed idea into a shareable, defensible piece of scholarship.

I usually start with a nagging thought. An irritation with a familiar argument, or a pattern I see across different debates, or a question that just won’t leave me alone—something that continues to bug me. At this stage, I begin by writing down a very rough abstract: a paragraph or two sketching the core claim, the basic structure of the argument, and why it might matter. It is only meant to capture the rough intuition. Nothing beyond that. The point is to get the idea out of my head and onto paper where I can see it, poke at it, and at some point, ask questions about. The three main questions I ask are: is the idea genuinely novel? Is it interesting enough? Is it intellectually defensible? The answer must be affirmative in each case before I proceed.

So for the next step, I hunt down the relevant literature by asking ChatGPT, surfing Google Scholar, and asking colleagues who work on similar stuff. That means scanning databases, following citations, and running it by ChatGPT, prompting it to analyze the idea like a referee at a top journal. If I find that someone has already the same article—or something close enough—I will usually shelve the idea. Sometimes, though, it means shifting the focus, narrowing the scope, or locating a gap or tension in the literature. The goal here is to avoid writing something redundant.

 Editor’s Note: The featured image at the top by WP AI. –DrWeb

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Have Pen, Laptop, and ChatGPT, Will Publish (guest post) – Daily Nous

#ArizonaStateUniversity #ChatGPT #Creativity #DailyNous #GuestPost #HavePen #HumanAIHybrids #JimmyAlfonsoLicon #Laptop #ResearchProcess #UncommonWisdom #WillPublish

Daily Nous asks, if people could get just one thing from philosophy, what would it be?

The answers people gave surprised me ...

https://dailynous.com/2024/11/21/if-people-could-get-just-one-thing-from-philosophy/

#philosophy #dailynous #thinking #criticalthinking #thought #question

If People Could Get Just One Thing From Philosophy… - Daily Nous

Happy World Philosophy Day! I don't want to detract from all of the festivities or dampen the fun, but it is worth noting on World Philosophy Day 2024 that despite the unavoidability of philosophical thinking, despite its ubiquity across the planet and throughout history, its role in culture and its place in educational institutions is

Daily Nous - news for & about the philosophy profession

So #OpenAI had a way to detect generated text with 99.9% accuracy for years and kept it from everyone. While there's ethics to consider that they likely withheld to gain competitive advantage, this also means model collapse can be mitigated. They CAN separate out large lengths of generated text when training future models.

#ai #chatGPT #LLMs #dailynous

https://dailynous.com/2024/08/05/open-ai-has-kept-secret-an-accurate-chatgpt-detector-for-two-years/

Open AI Has Kept Secret an Accurate ChatGPT Detector for Two Years - Daily Nous

According to The Wall Street Journal, "OpenAI has a method to reliably detect when someone uses ChatGPT to write an essay or research paper" but hasn't released it yet, despite concerns about widespread student cheating on assignments with it, as well as other illicit uses. - The WSJ writes: The project has been mired in internal debate

Daily Nous - news for & about the philosophy profession

I don't think there's a #DailyNous Mastodon account yet, so sharing this story. Thanks to @shengokai for getting into the Mastodon feed first.

From DN:

A philosophy organization is investigating the editorial processes at one of its journals after its publication of an article that contained a bizarre attack on a #philosophy #graduatestudent.  

https://dailynous.com/2022/11/09/philosophy-articles-remarks-graduate-student-editorial-policies/

Remarks about Graduate Student Raise Questions about Journal’s Editorial Policies | Daily Nous

The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain is investigating the editorial processes at one of its journals, Impact: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Policy (Wiley), after its latest issue included defamatory remarks about a graduate student in philosophy. In September, the journal published “How can universities promote academic freedom? Insights from the front line of the gender wars,” by Judith Suissa (UCL) and Alice Sullivan (UCL). The article concerns academic freedom as it relates to questions regarding sex, gender, and gender identity. In a section on “blacklisting, harassment, and smear campaigns,” Suissa and Sullivan write about Kathleen Stock (University of Austin), who resigned from the University of Sussex last year: The campaign against her has employed tactics that can only be described as bullying. For example, when Stock was invited to give a lecture on aesthetics at her own institution, graduate students invited a twitter-troll known primarily for her obsessive interest in Stock to give a talk denouncing her at the same time. The incident in question is well-known to the philosophical community, especially philosophers on Twitter. The person invited by the graduate students to deliver a talk was not, by any stretch of the imagination, “a twitter-troll,” but rather Christa Peterson, a graduate student in philosophy at the University of Southern California. Ms. Peterson has been one of Dr. Stock’s most persistent critics over the past few years, reading and responding to much of Stock’s writings on gender identity. Peterson has been highly critical of Stock, but her informed engagement is typically of the sort that might serve as a model form of commentary for the public medium. It is also odd for a journal article to describe Peterson as having an “obsessive interest in Stock”, for that is a rather insulting way of describing what simply amounts to a willingness to voice knowledgeable criticisms of the kinds of views Stock often expresses. Peterson’s talk was scheduled by the students at the same time as Stock’s as a way of protesting Stock’s views, but in a way intended to be compatible with Stock’s freedom of speech. It did not involve interrupting Stock’s talk, demonstrating at it, or blocking access to it. Yet Suissa and Sullivan present the holding of Peterson’s..

Daily Nous