"Schmidt, somewhat fatalistically, said that “we’re not going to hit the climate goals anyway,” and argued that rather than focus on reducing emissions, “I’d rather bet on A.I. solving the problem.”" https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/22/climate/ai-big-tech-emissions.html
I'd replace "fatalistically" with "disingenuously": the basic economic theory to stabilise climate has been around a century: #Pigou, #Coase... We don't implement it because we prefer to cash in the future now. AI can't fix our preferences. #climatechange #economics #econsky