Rather than waiting for AI-specific legislation, plaintiffs are trying to fit AI-related conduct into existing statutes and receiving mixed results from courts:

#AILitigation #DataPrivacy #Litigation #ArtificialIntelligence

https://www.zwillgen.com/litigation/old-statutes-new-targets-plaintiffs-using-existing-privacy-consumer-laws-against-ai-companies/

Musk v. Altman trial narrows from grand AI safety claims to contract disputes over documents and control. Judge limited testimony about AI extinction risks, keeping focus on charitable trust issues. Musk's courtroom behavior included objecting from witness stand. Case reveals gap between industry's existential rhetoric and legal realities.

#AILitigation #OpenAI #AIGovernance

https://www.implicator.ai/five-strange-scenes-from-musk-v-altman-2/

Musk testified that xAI "partly" used OpenAI models for training during Oakland trial proceedings. Judge Rogers kept the case narrowed to charitable trust law rather than AI safety concerns. OpenAI's defense strategy appears to center on xAI as evidence that Musk operates within the same commercial AI landscape he criticizes. #AILitigation #OpenAI #xAI

https://www.implicator.ai/musk-said-xai-used-openai-models-then-the-court-got-smaller/