🌖 PubPeer - 新型RNA-和FMRP結合蛋白TRF2-S調控軸突...
➤ PubPeer期刊報導新型RNA-和FMRP結合蛋白TRF2-S對神經元功能的影響
https://pubpeer.com/publications/323E84675EB2E849C56097D73D55FD#1
PubPeer線上期刊俱樂部,發表了有關新型RNA-和FMRP結合蛋白TRF2-S調控軸突mRNA運輸和突觸前可塑性的文章。作者Peisu Zhang等人的研究成果刊登於《自然通訊》(2015)。
+ 這篇文章提供了重要的神經科學研究進展,值得在學術界進一步討論。
+ PubPeer的報導對於神經科學領域的研究有所貢獻,有助於深入瞭解軸突mRNA運輸與突觸前可塑性的連結。
#學術期刊
PubPeer - Novel RNA- and FMRP-binding protein TRF2-S regulates axonal...

There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Novel RNA- and FMRP-binding protein TRF2-S regulates axonal mRNA transport and presynaptic plasticity (2015)

🌕 Terence Tao:「我的一篇論文今天被期刊拒絕了...」
➤ 震驚數學界的消息
https://mathstodon.xyz/@tao/113721192051328193
Terence Tao分享了今天一篇論文被學術期刊拒絕的消息。
+ 想知道這篇被拒絕的論文內容是什麼。
+ 無論是數學界的巨頭,也難免會遇到這種挫折。
#Terence Tao #數學 #學術期刊
Terence Tao (@tao@mathstodon.xyz)

One of my papers got declined today by the journal I submitted it to, with a polite letter saying that while they found the paper interesting, it was not a good fit for the journal. In truth, I largely agreed with their conclusions, and the paper is now submitted to a different (and hopefully more appropriate) journal. Rejection is actually a relatively common occurrence for me, happening once or twice a year on average. I occasionally mention this fact to my students and colleagues, who are sometimes surprised that my rejection rate is far from zero. I have belatedly realized our profession is far more willing to announce successful accomplishments (such as having a paper accepted, or a result proved) than unsuccessful ones (such as a paper rejected, or a proof attempt not working), except when the failures are somehow controversial. Because of this, a perception can be created that all of one's peers are achieving either success or controversy, with one's own personal career ending up becoming the only known source of examples of "mundane" failure. I speculate that this may be a contributor to the "impostor syndrome" that is prevalent in this field (though, again, not widely disseminated, due to the aforementioned reporting bias, and perhaps also due to some stigma regarding the topic). So I decided to report this (rather routine) rejection as a token gesture towards more accurate disclosure. (1/2)

Mathstodon
🌘 Elsevier 或許希望他們更仔細檢查了修訂過程。
➤ Elsevier 可能希望他們更仔細檢查了修訂過程。
https://community.nodebb.org/topic/254c582c-b8f0-4fef-a746-b7a012e4dad5/elsevier-may-wish-they-had-checked-the-revision-a-bit-more-carefully.
Elsevier 可能希望他們更仔細檢查了修訂過程。
+ 這提醒了出版社在修訂過程中必須更加謹慎。
+ 給予了 Elsevier 在處理修訂時更加謹慎的建議。
#Elsevier 出版社 #學術期刊
Elsevier may wish they had checked the revision a bit more carefully.

Elsevier may wish they had checked the revision a bit more carefully. PubPeer - Origin of the distinct site occupations of H atom in hcp Ti... There ar...

NodeBB Community
🌘 部署十字鍵 - 認可在戰爭遊戲中的分裂分析地圖
➤ 分析《戰爭遊戲》中的分裂分析技術應用及維納的賽博網觀念
https://exchanges.warwick.ac.uk/index.php/exchanges/article/download/837/831
這篇文章討論了費利克斯·瓜塔裏(Felix Guattari)的《分裂分析地圖》如何被應用於解釋受到福柯系統制度懲罰影響時主體表達性缺乏的情況。此外,文章還從賽博網學角度分析了電影《戰爭遊戲》,展示了分裂分析技術。同時,論文還討論了諾伯特·維納(Norbert Wiener)的賽博網觀念以及機器與人的關係。
+ 這篇摘要清晰地介紹了文章的主要內容,讓人對文中討論的主題有了充分的瞭解。
+ 摘要的撰寫方式簡潔明瞭,讓人對文章內容有了整體把握,讓人更想閱讀全文。
#分裂分析 #十字鍵 #戰爭遊戲 #賽博網 #學術期刊
🌖 《普遍拒絕期刊》
➤ 一家獨特的期刊:JofUR
https://universalrejection.org/
《普遍拒絕期刊》(JofUR)的創刊原則是拒絕,無論質量如何,所有投稿都將被拒絕。儘管如此,人們仍有幾個理由選擇向JofUR投稿:您可以無需擔心提交作品的命運而將手稿送到這裡,因為您可以百分之百確定它不會被接受出版。此外,JofUR是獨一無二的,向它提交工作可能被視為榮譽徽章,而您保留完全的作品權利並可以在我們的審查過程完成之前免費向其他期刊重新提交。此外,投稿決定通常在提交後的幾個小時內(雖然並非總是如此)決定。期刊還公示了其編輯委員會名單以及作者投稿說明。
+ 這家期刊的創刊宗旨真是特別,給作者提供了一個不同尋常的發表環境。
+ 這樣的期刊真的存在?這對作者來說可能會是個有趣的挑戰。
#學術期刊
Journal of Universal Rejection

🌘 停止印刷ACM期刊和交易
➤ ACM宣佈停止印刷期刊和交易,將專注於數位出版和提供先進的資源,以推動計算作為科學和職業的發展。
https://www.acm.org/publications/ceasing-print
ACM宣佈停止印刷其期刊和交易,將專注於數位出版和提供先進的資源,以推動計算作為科學和職業的發展。
+ 這是一個重要的轉變,反映了數位出版的趨勢。
+ 希望這個決定能夠提供更多的資源和便利性給讀者和作者。
#ACM #數位出版 #學術期刊
Ceasing Print Publication of ACM Journals and Transactions

Ceasing Print Editions for ACM Journals and Transactions