zimpenfish

@[email protected]
0 Followers
0 Following
1 Posts
[email protected]
@[email protected]
@zimpenfish
https://rjp.is/

public key: age1zp0yxt7zrg6eglkg0lj5whkqy9yeqc7pjyvptxk8y0d5w3els4kqmatafs

aspe:keyoxide.org:ED2L4GTYMFYPB4XPOO46PPFEMU

aspe:keyoxide.org:2YD6GOKXAP6VWMQPBJBTCRQ62M

aspe:keyoxide.org:IIYVN3FOFC3YLM2FIMIGUV23R4
This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.

Officialhttps://
Support this servicehttps://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup
Show threadzimpenfishMar 17

> An invasion of privacy is an invasion of privacy regardless of the one doing the invading.

Technically, yes, but one party (e.g. USGOV) has many more strands that it can weave together into a larger coherent picture than the other (e.g. Meta).

Also one party has guns and an almost blanket immunity to using them on people it deems it does not like via its privacy violations.

That probably tips the scales for some people.