The base load argument doesn’t hold water any more - not when there are places which are progressing towards being totally free of base load. Eg. South Australia is already nearly all renewable power with in-fill from batteries and transient gas power when needed. They’re still currently getting some base load from other states but it’s small and gradually being phased out.
- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 2 Posts
That so ridiculous it’s funny as hell.
I’d far prefer the huntsman to bedbugs. Huntsmans are pretty chill and eat bugs for you.
With the right attitude, any robot’s a sexbot.
…and my robot vacuum’s looking mighty fine right now.
Only 40 years to restore their entire population, by which time they’ll basically be Atlantis.
To be it looks like Australia’s getting the better end of the deal with Tuvalu essentially agreeing to be a military foothold of Australia in the Pacific.
Vasquez is always the best
As an Australian who’s travelled a fair bit I’d say some parts of Australia are more racist than others and most parts of the world I’ve visited are more racist than the major cities of Australia. But that’s just my personal observation.
That’s absolutely not true. Intel and AMD both have chips that outperform the M3 and were released quite some time back. The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D for example is a laptop processor which outperforms the M3 on nearly all benchmarks and uses only a slightly more power (about 15%).
They’re not economically feasible anywhere right now. Unfortunately nuclear power is very expensive compared to all the alternatives. Unless there’s some radical breakthrough I can’t see much nuclear being built in the future. No company would pay such a huge up-front cost to produce uneconomic electricity.
So the strict answer is - no, they’re not feasible everywhere. And also not feasible pretty much anywhere.