0 Followers
0 Following
4 Posts
This is infuriating, in particular the silencing of Gary Fettke for trying to reverse diabetes (and succeeding!) in his patients.

The Blue Zones Myth: What They Really Eat. Jesse Chappus, Belinda Fettke

https://discuss.online/post/36407199

The Blue Zones Myth: What They Really Eat. Jesse Chappus, Belinda Fettke - Discuss Online

Belinda Fettke is a public speaker and independent researcher exploring how vested interests and religious ideologies have shaped plant-biased dietary and health guidelines. ::: spoiler Summary - The “Blue Zones” as a Marketing Strategy - Trademarking and Ownership: Dan Buettner trademarked “Blue Zones” in 2005; the franchise was purchased by the Seventh-day Adventist Church in 2020. - Commercialization: The brand has expanded into books and supermarket frozen meals, including products from regions not originally part of the Blue Zones. - Accreditation Costs: Documentation suggested it could cost a community millions of dollars to become “Blue Zone accredited.” - The “Myth” of Plant-Based Longevity: Fettke argues that the claim of a 95–100% plant-based diet for longevity is a marketing narrative rather than reality, noting that traditional Blue Zones did not strictly follow such diets. - Belinda Fettke’s Background and Motivation - Professional History: Formerly a nurse and a professional photographer, which shaped her interest in storytelling and investigating hidden influences on dietary guidelines. - Gary Fettke’s Health Crisis and Dietary Shift - Cancer Diagnosis: Gary was diagnosed with an aggressive tumor in 2000, leading to years of surgery and chemotherapy. - The Role of Sugar: In 2011, Gary researched the link between sugar and cancer management, influenced by the work of Tom Seyfried. - Metformin and Glucose: After learning that the diabetes drug Metformin might help cancer by managing glucose, Gary chose to eliminate sugar and carbohydrates from his diet instead. - Medical Education Gaps: Gary realized that medical training is often “siloed,” focusing on “sick care” rather than the metabolic connection between carbohydrates and glucose. - The Importance of Animal Protein and Fats - Healing Tissues: As an orthopedic surgeon, Gary observed that diabetic ulcerations are “undernourished tissue” that requires animal protein and fats to heal, rather than just antibiotics. - Clinical Success: By advocating for reduced sugar/carbs and increased animal fats, Gary helped patients heal wounds and reduce their reliance on medications. - The Diabetes “Tsunami” and Institutional Resistance - Rising Severity: Type 2 diabetes has evolved from a “mature onset” condition to a “tsunami” affecting younger people and requiring frequent amputations. - Personal Results: Gary reversed his own pre-diabetes and put his cancer into remission through these dietary changes. - Medical Board Conflict: In 2014, Gary was reported to the medical board by a hospital dietitian for recommending these dietary changes to a patient at risk of losing a second limb. - The Investigation into Dietary Guidelines - Silencing of Gary Fettke: After being reported to the medical board, Gary was silenced and told he could not speak about nutrition. This prompted Belinda to investigate who was behind the opposition to low-carb, high-fat diets. - The Role of the Seventh-day Adventist Church: Belinda traces the origins of modern “plant-based” advocacy back to the founding of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and its prophet, Ellen G. White, who believed meat consumption increased “animal passions.” - Institutional Influence: She highlights how the church established sanitariums, food companies (like Kellogg’s), and universities (like Loma Linda) to promote a vegetarian agenda as a matter of religious “health reform.” - The “Plant-Based” Narrative and Blue Zones - Erasure of Animal Foods: Fettke argues that the Blue Zones project systematically ignores or minimizes the consumption of meat and animal fats in the original regions. - Sardinia and Okinawa: She points out that traditional Sardinians consumed significant amounts of lard, meat, and dairy, while Okinawans historically relied heavily on pork and lard, contrary to the “95% plant-based” claim. - The “Longevity Pill”: She describes the Blue Zones as a “plant-based longevity pill” designed for mass-market consumption, which simplifies complex regional histories into a marketable dietary product. - Corporate and Policy Integration - Blue Zones 2.0: The presentation covers the expansion of the brand into “Blue Zones Project” cities, where local governments and insurance companies pay for “accreditation” to change the local environment (e.g., grocery store layouts and restaurant menus). - Conflicts of Interest: Belinda discusses the “revolving door” between religious organizations, corporate food interests, and the medical boards that set dietary guidelines. - Lifestyle Medicine: She critiques the rise of “Lifestyle Medicine” as a vehicle for promoting specific religious dietary views under the guise of secular science. - Conclusion: Reclaiming Choice - The Importance of Critical Thinking: Fettke concludes by urging the audience to look past the marketing of the Blue Zones and recognize the importance of animal-sourced foods for metabolic health. - Personal Advocacy: She emphasizes that her work is about restoring the right of doctors and individuals to discuss nutrition based on metabolic science rather than religious or corporate ideology. :::

GitHub - zoicware/RemoveWindowsAI: Force Remove Copilot, Recall and More in Windows 11

https://discuss.online/post/35379227

Dr. James Muecke - 'What's driving Australia's Chronic Disease Crisis?'

https://discuss.online/post/34050227

Dr. James Muecke - 'What's driving Australia's Chronic Disease Crisis?' - Discuss Online

Worth listening to just for the section on history, notably the outsized effects that Ancel Keys and the Seventh Day Adventist Church have had on how we think about nutrition and diet. ::: spoiler Summary ___ Australia’s chronic-disease crisis, Dr. James Muecke argues, stems from ultra-processed foods and sugar-heavy diets that became dominant after decades of low-fat, high-carbohydrate dietary guidelines. He traces the problem to ideological and financial conflicts of interest: food manufacturers (notably Sanitarium and plant-based advocates), pharmaceutical firms, and religious lobby groups have shaped national dietary advice, secured subsidies, and infiltrated medical education, steering the public toward cheap, nutrient-poor products. Muecke shows that government inaction—allowing predatory marketing and keeping conflicted experts on advisory panels—locks in consumption of these foods, driving type 2 diabetes, blindness, and other preventable conditions. Fixing the crisis, he concludes, requires stripping industry influence from policy, ending subsidies for ultra-processed foods, and returning to whole-food, lower-carbohydrate diets, a shift he estimates could save tens of billions of dollars and sharply cut chronic-disease rates. :::

Butter Is Not Back: The Broken Promise on Saturated Fats

https://discuss.online/post/33522704

Butter Is Not Back: The Broken Promise on Saturated Fats - Discuss Online

Nina Teicholz discusses the new American Dietary Guidelines. ::: spoiler Summary The article “Butter Is Not Back: The Broken Promise on Saturated Fats” critiques the updated U.S. Dietary Guidelines, highlighting a major contradiction between new food recommendations and restrictive nutrient caps. The key points of the article include: The Saturated Fat Conflict: Despite initial promises to move away from strict limits on saturated fats, the guidelines retain a 10% calorie cap. This creates a paradox, as the updated food pyramid now encourages cooking with butter and tallow and features red meat prominently. Impact on Federal Programs: The author notes that while average consumers might ignore the cap, vulnerable populations relying on federal food programs must adhere to it strictly, making it nearly impossible for them to consume the newly encouraged foods. Positive Changes: The article acknowledges some progress, such as a dramatic reduction in sugar limits and the recognition of low-carbohydrate diets as a viable option for managing certain health conditions. Scientific vs. Political Influence: The author expresses disappointment that the saturated fat cap remains despite what they describe as evolving scientific evidence supporting its safety. The reversal is attributed to political considerations rather than a lack of scientific consensus. :::

Book Review: Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind - Georgia Ede MD

https://discuss.online/post/32300528

Book Review: Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind - Georgia Ede MD - Discuss Online

The official website for the book is here: https://www.diagnosisdiet.com/full-article/all-about-my-new-book-change-your-diet-change-your-mind [https://www.diagnosisdiet.com/full-article/all-about-my-new-book-change-your-diet-change-your-mind] It’s been a while since I’ve finished this book, and the details are not so fresh in my mind any more, but it’s more a book about right (and wrong) nutrition and how it affects brain metabolism than it is a book purely about the brain, which was what I thought it was going to be about. The book discusses what we eat and what foods can cause metabolic distress. It discusses things like oxidative stress, inflammation, and hormones. There is a little section on the historical reason behind the dietary guidelines, how we came to demonize saturated fat. Dr. Ede provides helpful mention of other authors to also read, such as Nina Teicholz, but does not do a deep-dive into history. The book also spends a lot of time going over animal foods and plant foods, including things such as nutrient availability, plant toxins, anti-nutrients, and so on. None of this is new to anyone in this community, but the book makes an excellent starting point and I’d recommend it to people just starting out since it touches on just about every salient point in the ongoing debate about our diets. The book also discusses the lack of any evidence when it comes to the widely perceived “health benefits” of plant based diets. The book ends with a several lists of foods that do not cause inflammation (“quiet foods”). I found myself looking this up a lot when discussing the matter with friends who don’t want to go fully carnivore but would like to know what foods to avoid. Useful to have around! Recommended. Extra recommendation since it’s one of the few books available in Japanese [https://publications.asahi.com/product/25421.html] and so I’ve bought a physical copy so I can lend it to friends. However, for metabolic psychiatry in particular, perhaps Brain Energy by Christopher M. Palmer, MD. (I’m halfway through this one) is richer in detail.

Dr. Schindler mentions this opinion from Discover magazine in 1987: …ucdavis.edu/…/Diamond-TheWorstMistakeInTheHistor…

I’ll read this next.

Jesse Chappus: Discussing the Blue Zones diet with Dr. Bill Schindler

https://discuss.online/post/28970505

Jesse Chappus: Discussing the Blue Zones diet with Dr. Bill Schindler - Discuss Online

They mostly talk about Sardinia, but as someone living in Japan, the Okinawan diet is also poorly reported in blue zones study. Okinawans eat a lot of pork, and it’s the part of Japan that consumes the most luncheon meat, which isn’t popular here in Tokyo. It’s even considered Okinawan “soul food.” To quote https://www.bluezones.com/explorations/okinawa-japan/ [https://www.bluezones.com/explorations/okinawa-japan/] > Older Okinawans have eaten a plant-based diet most of their lives. Their meals of stir-fried vegetables, sweet potatoes, and tofu are high in nutrients and low in calories. This is a bald-faced lie, and I’m amazed they’re allowed to get away with it. “Older” Okinawans lived through postwar Japan. Everyone was poor and unable to afford food. The low cost is likely one of the reasons why luncheon meat became popular in Okinawa in the first place! ::: spoiler Summary Title: The Blue Zones Diet Debunked - THIS Is What They ACTUALLY EAT… | Dr. Bill Schindler - Fermentation is a key ancestral food processing technique that enhances nutrition, detoxifies foods, and improves shelf life. - Plants were a significant part of human diets long before meat was introduced, and they continued to be consumed alongside meat. - The domestication of plants has led to a reduction in their natural defense mechanisms, making them more susceptible to pests and diseases. - Modern agricultural practices often strip plants of their natural toxins, which can be harmful if consumed in large quantities or improperly processed. - The Blue Zones diet, often misrepresented as plant-based, actually includes a significant amount of animal products and fermented foods. - Salt has been an important part of human diets since ancient times, with high-quality, mineral-rich salts being the most beneficial. - Traditional diets were highly diverse and seasonal, with a focus on locally available and hyper-seasonal plants and animals. - The modern industrial food system has led to a loss of diversity in diets, with a focus on a limited range of crops and animal products. - The role of plants in traditional diets was multifaceted, including nutrition, entertainment, medicine, and poison. - The misrepresentation of the Blue Zones diet has led to a misunderstanding of the importance of animal products and fermented foods in traditional diets. :::

Metabolic Mind: Discussing the EAT-Lancet Diet report and the "misinfluencer" campaign with Dr. Georgia Ede and Dr. Bret Scher

https://discuss.online/post/28792695

Metabolic Mind: Discussing the EAT-Lancet Diet report and the "misinfluencer" campaign with Dr. Georgia Ede and Dr. Bret Scher - Discuss Online

Dr. Georgia Ede and Dr. Bret Scher discuss the recently released EAT-Lancet diet report. I found it particularly interesting that they responded to the criticism of the first report by re-releasing it and removing the parts of the report that were criticised, without directly addressing the criticism. Dr. Shrer: > In advance of the release of the 2.0 [diet report], there was actually a release of the “mis-influencers” who have done an organized approach to discredit and attack EAT-Lancet. Their words, not mine. And you were listed as a very high-ranking member of this. So first, how does it feel to be labeled as a “misinfluencer”? Dr. Ede: > It’s interesting. I actually think it’s a very good thing. And the reason why is clearly [that] the content that I produced that criticized the EAT-Lancet report came to their attention. I think that that’s no small thing, and I would like to believe that the content that I and others produced had a lot to do with the fact that they felt the need to produce this report to try to discredit all of us. I think it may also have had something to do with the way the report was re-released. I noticed that certain things that I criticized about the report are no longer there, and I’m not the only one who produced content critiquing the report. > Also, there are certain concerns that I and others voiced about the content of the report, and it appears as though the authors have gone to great lengths to try to acknowledge and address [these concerns] without actually addressing them. But they’re trying to make it look as though they’re addressing these shortcomings. ::: spoiler Summary Title: Exposing the Truth Behind EAT-Lancet’s Diet Report & MisInfluencer Campaign - The EAT-Lancet report aims to control global dietary habits by promoting a plant-based diet for planetary health, but its scientific foundation is questioned. - The report’s dietary recommendations are criticized for being nutritionally inadequate, particularly for vulnerable groups like pregnant women, children, and the elderly. - The EAT-Lancet diet is accused of disregarding the nutritional benefits of animal-based foods, which are essential for optimal human health, including brain development and mental health. - The report heavily relies on nutrition epidemiology, which is considered unreliable for making global dietary recommendations. - The EAT-Lancet diet is criticized for being overly restrictive and not accounting for individual differences in metabolism, genetics, and cultural food preferences. - The report’s authors are accused of having conflicts of interest, as they are connected to major food corporations that produce ultra-processed foods and chemical fertilizers. - The EAT-Lancet diet is seen as an attempt to control people’s eating habits, rather than promoting a flexible and inclusive approach to nutrition. - The report’s dietary recommendations are criticized for being based on untested theories and guesswork, rather than solid scientific evidence. - The EAT-Lancet diet is accused of being environmentally unfriendly, as it does not adequately address the environmental impact of industrial plant food production. - The report’s authors are criticized for labeling critics as ‘mis-influencers’ without providing substantial evidence to support their claims. :::

Fallow: We Cooked Every Steak to See if Wagyu is Overrated

https://discuss.online/post/28710062

Fallow: We Cooked Every Steak to See if Wagyu is Overrated - Discuss Online

Loved the pictures of all the breeds of cow and also the description of how they’ve come about and what they taste like. ::: spoiler Results [https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/585679bc-e2c0-42cb-b1ee-ac142f0eadd4.png]