This is insanely frustrating. You want me to spend $3500 on a device my partner can't even use regularly?
https://www.macworld.com/article/1944557/apple-vision-pro-user-account-guest.html
This is insanely frustrating. You want me to spend $3500 on a device my partner can't even use regularly?
https://www.macworld.com/article/1944557/apple-vision-pro-user-account-guest.html
https://www.macrumors.com/2023/06/07/apple-vision-pro-hands-on/
I think it's telling that tech journalists, people who have tried a lot of VR gear over the past few years, have been completely blown away.
Personally, I'm getting one. Yes it's expensive. But I'm looking at it like this - in 20 years, even if this turns out to be a Pippin or Lisa, I'm going to be happy I have it on my shelf.
An interesting note about the Vision Pro announcement yesterday - no discussion whatsoever of any kind of a "metaverse." All video calls were with non-VR users on webcams.
I think Apple is trying to be realistic - for the next few years, adoption will be low enough that you're almost never going to be on a call with other Vision Pro users. So they are highlighting the actual, real world use cases rather than some idealized future.
Interesting. Last year the gap between keynote and platforms SotU was four hours. This year it's three and a half.
Shorter keynote? @gruber still think they will announce a headset?
https://www.macrumors.com/2023/05/23/apple-announces-wwdc-2023-schedule/