They named journals differently in the old days! I just was referred to a 1989 article published in "Intellectica."
(Reminds me of the Roz Chast cartoon of "The man who was loved for his lack of lack-of-pretense")
| Web | https://bewitched.com |
They named journals differently in the old days! I just was referred to a 1989 article published in "Intellectica."
(Reminds me of the Roz Chast cartoon of "The man who was loved for his lack of lack-of-pretense")
Forget human metaphors for software agents. Why not God metaphors?
Here's a paper that actually tested this! (Jung et al, CHI 22, https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3491102.3517653 )
Sample dialog from their protocol: "Greetings, I am the lord thy god. You shall help researchers at a university by participating in this research."
Their deadpan conclusion:
"an agent metaphor that locates higher than Human in the Great Chain of Being framework may disappoint workers in the system's ability due to high expectations"
I made a digital picture frame running on a raspberry pi that runs midjourney in the background.
User scans the QR code, enters a prompt, swaps the image.
This is lovely and generous work.
Recently Iโve been working on recoding the programs of the book "Dessins gรฉomรฉtriques et artistiques avec votre micro-ordinateur" with #p5js. Around 250 sketches were recoded using a tiny custom js lib.
๐ https://github.com/v3ga/dessins_geometriques_et_artistiques
๐ฆ๐: https://twitter.com/v3ga/status/1610314241088671744
Help me track down a citation! I remember reading about an old (1970s?) study, asking strong chess players to predict the highest possible rating a chess program would ever reach. The results were consistent: players usually said the maximum would be 100 points less than their own rating.
But I can't find a reference! Is this too on-the-nose to be true? Did I imagine it?
Who would have thought that adding a Sierpinski Triangle Fractal as musical notes would actually sound good!๐
๐ฆ๐: https://twitter.com/luismbat/status/1605638982867554334