23 Followers
88 Following
7 Posts
John Pottow and I have posted a reply to the Credit Slips blog. We explain the integral role of COMI (center of main interest) in the cross-border bankruptcy architecture. https://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2023/12/cross-border-insolvency-forum-shopping-naivete-.html.
Strategic venue choice has recently been a bit of an embarrassment to the US bankruptcy system, with the “Texas Two-Step” as its apotheosis. Recently, three prominent professors wrote an open letter to UNCITRAL proposing to take that problem global (https://globalrestructuringreview.com/article/leading-academics-and-lawyers-urge-uncitral-replace-the-concept-of-comi).
Leading academics and lawyers urge UNCITRAL to replace the concept of COMI

The use of a debtor’s centre of main interests to determine the place where a foreign main proceeding should take place under the UNCITRAL Model Law is a “major flaw” that undermines the ability of insolvency law to reorganise viable businesses, according to a group of law professors supported by a host of industry heavyweights from around the globe.

murmur murmur murmur

mutter mutter mutter

angry guy with glasses

somber looking guy next to him

someone whispering to McCarthy.

And that's my #SpeakerOfTheHouse update.

The New York Times has editorialized angrily against forced arbitration -- a system designed to protect companies from accountability.

So guess what I found in my inbox this morning. Yes! Subscribers to the NY Times must now submit to forced arbitration if there's a dispute:

https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893428-Terms-of-service?launch_id=18232205#12