Hi. I like computers.
I also like cats. Cats are cool.
Hi. I like computers.
I also like cats. Cats are cool.
But, if you have an answer that actually, genuinely proves that this âneuralâ network is operating similarly to how the human brain does⌠then you have invalidated your original post. Because if it really is thinking like a human, NO ONE should own it.
I think this is a neat point.
The human brain is very complex. The neural networks trained on computers right now are more like collections of neurons grown together in a petri dish, rather than a full human brain. They serve one function, say, recognizing or generating an image or calculating some probability or deciding on what the next word should be in a sequence. While the brain is a huge internetwork of these smaller, more specialized neural networks.
No, neural networks donât have a database and they donât do stats. Theyâre trained through trial and error, not aggregation. The way they work is explicitly based on a mathematical model of a biological neuron.
And when an AI is developed thatâs advanced enough to rival the actual human brain, then yeah, the AI rights question becomes a real thing. Weâre not there yet, though. Still just matter in petri dishes. Thatâs a whole other controversial argument.
I was at Walmart the other day and there were four employees standing around the self checkout. They all said bye to me when I left. Weird shit.
At that point, why not just have them work the tills??
Personally, Iâm a comp sci graduate who did several courses exploring AI, but I actually started out in fine arts and continue to paint, write, and play music to this day. Iâm sure Iâll be blending these studies in some way when I move on to my masterâs.
I agree that automation is scary. Itâs unregulated. But itâs not the tech so much thatâs evil, but rather the employers who see it as a reason to get rid of employees. And before, itâd be manual labour that we replaced with machines. People doing mental labour thought they were immune, until now theyâre not. Our economic systemâs going to need to change in some way.
But generative AI can be very good even for artists. For example, sometimes I suffer from writerâs block (who doesnât?). Now, I can feed what Iâm working on into chatGPT and have it spit out an example of the next paragraph. Sometimes thatâs enough to spur me on so I can write the next page.
Artist movements in general are pretty conservative. When digital painting first became a thing, allowing people use layers and filters so easily, the kneejerk reaction by artists was to consider it cheating.
My hope is that in an ideal world, human-made art becomes valuable in the future precisely because it has the human touch. Live music played on real instruments, paintings on canvas, the sorts of things with quirks and imperfections and a human element that canât be mass produced. Let the corporations have their algorithmic, soulless advertisements, and let the people focus on true self expression.
But then for people without artistic talent, say those who want to make indie games but canât hire an artist or a musician because theyâre just some kid with a dream and little experience? Hell, why not let them generate some assets with AI?
But we need to make sure that people arenât afraid of becoming homeless, starving on the streets. I think, weâre not getting rid of AI at this point, itâs too powerful, and I donât have an answer to our societal problems. For better or worse, weâll adapt.
Itâs probably related to the fact that it seems a lot of Lemmy users are in tech, rather than art.
I think generative AI is a great tool, but a lot of people who donât understand how it works either overestimate (it can do everything and itâs so smart!!) or underestimate it (all it does is steal my work!!)
Ugh youâre right. I admit Iâve scrolled through AITA more often than I should, because something about it is really entertaining.
But itâs like junk food, I donât really feel good Iâm done with it. More vindictive, like those revenge subs. Being off Reddit has reduced how much I see it, and I donât particularly want to go back to that.