temp_acct_001

0 Followers
0 Following
12 Posts
The Yes and No arguments have been published without fact checking. Here's what you need to know

The Yes and No cases for the Voice to Parliament, drafted by parliamentarians from each side of the debate. Who kept their facts straight?

ABC News

Dispelling Australia's Referendum Misunderstandings

https://lemmy.world/post/6789352

Dispelling Australia's Referendum Misunderstandings - Lemmy.World

Hello All, I thought i’d start a discussion on this as there is an international reputation forming that may not be justified due to misinformation. The vote was to change the Australian Constitution to include a section giving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples a voice in parliament, which they already have through inner dialogue between their mobs and local governments. How this constitutional change would look or be enacted was not known and very vague, with the crux being that it would still be government controlled, there was widespread animosity from First Nations people about it being another ‘white-man’s decision’, it would create division by being unequal when indigenous Australians are striving for equality. These are the key reasons behind the nation’s ‘No’ vote. It was never a vote about if you ‘like Aboriginal Australians or not’ as many of the articles here seem to indicate.