If what posts are constructive is determined by votes and bots are the majority… 😬

Poisoning the well.

Companies make money using open source code and ignore the licenses which compel them to release their source code (out of ignorance, laziness and selfish gains). While AI generated cannot be copyrighted then you cannot apply copyleft licenses to that code. Telling human authored code from AI slop may be less than 100% obvious to tell, which could may make it more difficult to enforce copyleft compliance in a lawsuit.

I’ve said aught for so long I was questioning if this an elaborate prank that somehow changed my search results. Damn.

I don’t want help “proving who I am online”. I want to pay in hard cash online - or use GNU Taler which is private to the buyer but not the seller (for TAX reasons).

“Show me your papers” aught to be so anti-British that any goverment officals promoting IDs are leaning over the line of being traitors.

Linux phone, landline, or tin can and string.

Software freedom or demise. While Google is capable of imposing anything then Android is already dead to me.

I can’t wait for people to have proprietary software running on their wifi brain implant

By proxy (to Godot), Slay the Spire 2 is also open-source.

Using an open source game engine doesn’t make your game open source. Even if you could get the source code onto your computer that doesn’t mean you can redistribute it legally.

A dev saying they’re not bothered about piracy and hope people can learn from the source code is building a house on sand. An actual open source license is uncomparable as a foundation to build upon it.

“I didn’t do anything wrong”, says man who doesn’t understand the concept of consent or ownership.

Are they lying about secure boot being a reason or can I go back to thinking SB is part of Microsoft’s EEE attack on software freedom?