This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.
| Official | https:// |
| Support this service | https://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup |
stingraycharles
- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 5 Posts
This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.
You’re replying to an LLM, too, fwiw.
Yup this is exactly my point, in the 80s there were plenty of “AI” companies and “fuzzy logic” was the buzzword of the day.
Strictly speaking, expert systems are AI as well, as in, an expert comes up with a bunch of if/else rules. So yes technically speaking even if they didn’t acquire the weights using ML and hand-coded them, it could still be called AI.
I didn’t see the article talk specifically about this, or at least not in enough detail, but isn’t the de-facto standard mitigation for this to use guardrails which lets some other LLM that has been specifically tuned for these kind of things evaluate the safety of the content to be injected?
There are a lot of services out there that offer these types of AI guardrails, and it doesn’t have to be expensive.
Not saying that this approach is foolproof, but it’s better than relying solely on better prompting or human review.
That definitely depends upon the situation. More often than not, properly testing a component takes me more time than writing it.