0 Followers
0 Following
2 Posts
Lead Platform Engineer at Halter but speaking for myself.

Feel free to contact me at marcus(at)utf9k(dot)net

---

automated junk below

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/marcuscrane; my proof: https://keybase.io/marcuscrane/sigs/YWbaXGw10b1r6YwVga455NAs0ZLoRjxpVweDkJI6ZYw ]
wonderfuldev_gabfjkmp1o6cu5sz6tc8bt47

HackerSmacker profile: https://www.hackersmacker.org/user/spondyl?hs=CEzDD14NmTpisOYE6k

spondyl.at.hn

meet.hn/city/-36.852095,174.7631803/Auckland

Socials:
- github.com/marcus-crane
- utf9k.net
This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.

Officialhttps://
Support this servicehttps://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup

Here are some relevant excerpts from an October 2025 article[1]:

> In a message to GitHub’s staff, CTO Vladimir Fedorov notes that GitHub is constrained on capacity in its Virginia data center. “It’s existential for us to keep up with the demands of AI and Copilot, which are changing how people use GitHub,” he writes.

> The plan, he writes, is for GitHub to completely move out of its own data centers in 24 months. “This means we have 18 months to execute (with a 6 month buffer),” Fedorov’s memo says. He acknowledges that since any migration of this scope will have to run in parallel on both the new and old infrastructure for at least six months, the team realistically needs to get this work done in the next 12 months.

If you consider that six month parallel window to have started from the time of the October memo (written presumably at the start of October), then that puts us currently or past the point where they would have cut off their old DC and defaulted to Azure only.

Whether plans or timelines changed, I have no idea of course but the above does make for a convenient timeline that would explain the recent instability. Of course, it could also just be symptomatic of increased AI usage generally and the same problems might have surfaced at a software level regardless of whether they were in a DC or on Azure.

Putting that nuance aside, personally I like the idea that Azure is simply a giant pile of shit operated by a corporation with no taste.

[1]: https://thenewstack.io/github-will-prioritize-migrating-to-a...

GitHub Will Prioritize Migrating to Azure Over Feature Development

GitHub is working on migrating all of its infrastructure to Azure, even though this means it'll have to delay some feature development.

The New Stack

I came here to say that this is pretty much my view having poked around a little bit as well.

This file does not exactly fill me with confidence: https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings...

In one part of the report, there seems to be this implicit assumption that Linux and Horizon OS (Meta's VR OS) are somehow comparable and that Meta will be better equipped than Linux if age verification is required.

It doesn't explicitly say "This will allow Horizon OS to become the defacto OS and Linux will die out" but that seems to be the impression I'm getting which uhh... would make zero sense.

More broadly, this entire report (and others like it) are extremely annoying in that I've seen some Reddit comments either taking "lots of text" as a signal of quality or asking "Does anyone have proof that these claims are inaccurate" which is

a) Of course entirely backwards as far as burden of proof

b) Not even the right rubick because it's not facts versus lies, it's manufactured intent/correlations versus real life intent/correlations (ie; bullshit versus not)

All of this could be factually true without Meta being smart enough to play 5D chess

meta-lobbying-and-other-findings/output/reports/anomaly_report.md at main · upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings

Contribute to upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub