Laurent Bercot

840 Followers
45 Following
7.7K Posts

Grumpy Frenchman, C/Unix addict, author of s6 and other software at skarnet.org.

Good tech (so, probably not the tech you're thinking about), energy transition and climate change, leftist politics, psychology and self-improvement, pillow philosophy, songwriting and production, mechanisms of storytelling, video games as an art medium, shitposting.

Personal websitehttps://skarnet.org
Business websitehttps://skarnet.com
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/laurentbercot
Githubhttps://github.com/skarnet

Another day, another attempt to rewrite the world a little bit less and use an existing standard tool, because that's what they were made for...

... and another failure. kill does not have a portable way of sending a numbered signal to a process. When you have a signal number, you can use the kill() system call to send that signal to a process, but not the kill command-line utility.

Yes, I understand that you are supposed to address signals by their name and not by their number, but since the system call uses numbers in the first place, would it have been so horrible to allow the command line to do the same? And so, I am now writing a s6-frontend-kill command line helper. 

Moments before the show.
Do these people suck at timing and apropos or what
This is my yearly week of (literally) touching grass
You are really selling the total transparency, clarity and ease of navigation, Wise. 👍
@landley Apparently this is a German ad. I thought you might like it.
When we said it was a bad idea to let capitalism into the domain name business, WE MEANT IT.