Reminder to use strong passwords
- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 2 Posts
AI Generated Content is now banned.
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I get that this is a contentious issue, and I appreciate everyone being nice to eachother (and me) while discussing it. (Those of you that didn’t, you know who you are)
Based on the upvoted comments and the arguments that I found most cogent, I will be banning generative AI in the community.
A few related issues were raised, and I’d like to explain how I intend to address them:
ttrpg.network/post/26260249/17201676 Rhaedus raised concerns about the difficulty in determining if something is AI generated or not. As with all rule enforcement on this site, I’ll be relying on you all to report suspected violations, and I promise I’ll give you my best-effort attempt to make a fair judgement.
ttrpg.network/post/26260249/17206513 Carl and others raised concerns that this might impact posts predominantly about human-created content that have some trivial or incidental amount of AI generated comment. In such a situation, if the use of Gen AI is really that minimal, it would never come to my attention in the first place, and therefore wouldn’t get removed anyway.
Several users advocated for an explicit carve out for discussions about the use of AI, which is a good idea and will be included in the rule.
Thank you again for your input and your civility.
Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI? - The TTRPG network
I’ve been reading about the user revolt on the Twin Peaks subreddit calling for a ban on AI art. As best I can tell we don’t really have people posting AI stuff here yet, but I’m wondering if it would be a good idea to ban it before it becomes a problem. I’m soliciting feedback from y’all on this, please let me know what you prefer.
Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI?
Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI? - The TTRPG network
I’ve been reading about the user revolt on the Twin Peaks subreddit calling for a ban on AI art. As best I can tell we don’t really have people posting AI stuff here yet, but I’m wondering if it would be a good idea to ban it before it becomes a problem. I’m soliciting feedback from y’all on this, please let me know what you prefer.
A small logistics tweak that's worked well for me
A small logistics tweak that's worked well for me - The TTRPG network
Perhaps obvious to everyone else, but I’ve hit upon a little trick for better coordinating game time. Instead of announcing “Game will be at 1 o’clock” I’ve been doing something like “Doors open at Noon, Game starts at 1.” This way, the people that want to hang out, level their characters, decide what they like on their pizza, etc all show up at noon, and the people that are running late or decide to come at 1 arrive with the expectation that they’re going to walk in the door and immediately start playing. It also provides a natural transition point from the arriving/hanging out mode to game time, which otherwise makes me feel kind of uncomfortably teacher-y, calling the whole class together and whatnot. Try it out, maybe it will help you too.
In castle/fortress design, what do you call the wall placed immediately inside the gates that prevents the enemy from having a straight shot into your fortress?
Is it possible to have Wikipedia sources in a cycle? - The TTRPG network
I’m not very familiar with how Wikipedia vets the sources in the references/external links. I was wondering whether there are manual or automated checks for cyclic sources, for example a Wikipedia page cites a source for something, but such source after a few rounds of citing would go back to the same Wikipedia page. - Does that happen with Wikipedia? - Does it matter? I presume that would invalidate the source? - How do they make sure it does not happen? Is there an automated check or something?
It's not Critical Role, it's Podcasting Itself
It's not Critical Role, it's Podcasting Itself - The TTRPG network
I recently started a new campaign. Two players (one who has played in my games before and their SO, who has been begging me for a spot for years) unexpectedly dropped out, moments before our first session. Their reason was somewhat baffling; they said they didn’t want to spend “all day” on this, despite the game only going from noon to 3PM. They seemed to think this was a totally unreasonable expectation on my part, despite them previously having stated they were available during that time. This puzzled me. I’ve been musing on this, and the strange paradox of people that say they want to play D&D but don’t actually want to play D&D, and I’ve had an epiphany. A lot of people blame Critical Role or other popular D&D shows for giving prospective misplaced perceptions, often related to things like your DM’s voice acting ability or prop budget, but I don’t think that’s what’s going on here. My realization is that, encoded in the medium of podcasts and play videos, is another expectation: new players unconsciously expect to receive D&D the way they receive D&D shows: on-demand, at their house, able to be paused and restarted at their whim, and possibly on a second-screen while they focus on something else! I don’t know as this suggests anything we as DMs could do differently to set expectations, but it did go a long ways to helping me understand my friends, and I thought it might help someone here to share.
I need 1 more thing an evil necromancer dictator would have in his garden