Peak comment. Did you RTA? Because it does the opposite of what you propose, no factual evidence, and largely biased language.

So…? We’re just supposed to take their word that the sky isn’t blue because in the past they’ve said the the sky is blue?

The family of Jaahnavi Kandula, a 23-year-old Indian student killed in a U.S. police crash a few years ago, suffered a second devastating blow after her father passed away just two days before the announcement of a $29 million compensation deal.

Jaahnavi’s life was cut short on January 23, 2023, when she was knocked down by a speeding Seattle police vehicle while she was crossing the street. The officer involved was responding to an emergency call at that time.

A relative of Jaahnavi told PTI that Kandula Srikanth, a retired police constable, died of a heart attack on February 10 here in Kurnool district. Seattle police officer who fatally struck Jaahnavi Kandula fired from department.

“His (Srikanth’s) last rites were performed on Wednesday (February 11, 2026) in Adoni, as the family grappled with yet another devastating loss,” said the relative on Friday (February 13).

Video shows U.S. policeman laughing over death of Indian student killed by patrol car.

He further said the family is currently mourning, and it was not appropriate to speak about the settlement money.

Jaahnavi was a Master’s student in Information Systems at the Seattle campus of Northeastern University.

Published - February 13, 2026 01:41 pm IST

I think I agree with everything you said except that 4chan was the face of it. Even in the digital realm alone, there are far larger and far more toxic avenues, and one of the largest is staring at most everyone in the face every day. Facebook has been far worse imo than 4chan could ever dream to be, for the very same reasons 4chan is condemned.

I’ll concede that could be my subjective viewpoint tho based on my interactions with both of them.

Appropriately attributing blame to those who perpetuate it. It is possible that 4chan was a useful tool, but 4chan itself is hardly invested it keeping everyone divided to pull people away from actual issues.

They also pale in comparison to the influence political leaders, mass media, and billionaires have.

And? 4chan was a shithole. I don’t know why I’d be defensive over it.

I just thinking blaming edgelord neckbeards with terminal online syndrome for the current political landscape is a cop-out and naive at BEST.

If that’s a defensive position to take of 4chan your bar is extremely low.

I believe this post, like many others are correlating the creation of the /pol/ board on 4chan after moot had a conversation with Epstein or something.

Acting like /pol/ and 4chan is solely responsible for the entire situation is just a vapid braindead take, much less the idea that a political board on a popular forum hangout is some meniacal master plan…

Obviously all this Epstein shit is heinous af, but acting like he’s the origin of all evil just fucking hilarious “this is your brain on religion” logic. That being said, Epstein would definitely make a good “Satan’s avatar” in a story…

Both the original and this sequel are based on books. So I guess your argument rings true, but it’s not what I usually associated with Hollywood recycling ideas.

Does Valve employ people at minimum wage? I’ve only heard good things about how much Valve employees make.

You know what was the original point right? About how Amazon makes its money off the backs of others being unfairly paid low wages.

And for arguments sake… I agree billionaires shouldn’t exist, and that any successful enterprise in a capitalist system is built on the exploitation of unfair wage distribution somewhere down the line (Steams could be it’s hard 30% fee); but I don’t think either of those were the implied point of the original post.

Lol… dansup isn’t perfect, but it’s always funny when I see these biased af accounts trying to bury him over the most petty shit.

Lol. The idea that you think individual people making 60k a year where they are largely traveling nowhere other than to work and back are the ones that decrease their emissions by 97% is just bonkers.

That metric in the article, in conjunction with the OOP’s article, which quite likely accurate, doesn’t accrue enough accuracy on where the weight of blame lies imo.

The correlated idea borderlines on original sin nonsense. And yes, while simply existing in the inefficient system that is the US rises your carbon footprint, there are far more significant measures that could be made than telling people edging the poverty line to reduce their emissions.

Also your link you keep posting around doesn’t seem to account for cost of living, PPP, taxation etc, or if it does, it doesn’t seem to source it. It would be interesting to see how those numbers change with those variables accounted for.