Why are you still posting here?

It’s not OK, but:

it’s not the same as rape itself, it’s a far lesser crime morally that driving while drunk,

we can’t be certain that’s what happened, from the OP grouping drawn images and photos together. “Photos” might have been AI-generated. OP seems unapologetic and certain these are the same and a crime because such pictures “shouldn’t be in someone’s possession”. OP also apparently doesn’t see the difference between pedophilia as a condition and sexually abusing a child.

You must be in jail.

Are fucking serious asking that? Do you even understand why some things are wrong to do and some are not?

Somebody who has committed an offence of a sexual nature.

Is she, like, picturesexual? Pixelsexual, pensexual?

Do you even understand the words you are using?

Very incriminating thing to say. Maybe you shouldn’t have materials like that.

Nothing criminal has been mentioned. So nothing incriminating could have been said.

May not be a real person but people in general shouldn’t have lewd cartoons of children.

Not your business what others have. Only things affecting others may be the business of those others.

Apparently, she had lewd pictures both real and drawn of little girls being abused. Some were as young as three or four.

So you are telling us all her crime was in having materials?

And you are calling her a sex offender, despite her having sexually abused nobody?

I’ve seen war gore on the web, does it make me a murderer? Some I have been looking for. Humans are curious.

I have also been looking for CP when being like 11-12, but have found none.

For fucking real.

If I were accused of something like this based on possession of materials, and someone close to me would think the way you do, that would be the thing pissing me the most by far.

Everyone like you and similar to you are fucking apes, sorry.

“Pictures both real and drawn”, my ass. Whom can possibly a person making\keeping a drawing for themselves legally abuse?

Yes, also as someone from Russia - you know, if for citizens of Russia it were easier, not harder, to cross borders, emigrate, use various international systems (like payment systems) and such, then any rumor of a new wave of mobilization and any economic problem (from the real kind of sanctions, like those on fossil fuels, not like on me paying for stuff on the Internet, BTW, Putin’s relatives have recently made “acquisitions” of grain businesses, so fossil fuel sanctions do work) would lead to waves of people leaving.

As someone also Jewish - making Jews fear retaliation for Israel’s actions is not a very good way to hurt Israel, and making even Israelis fear that means that they might fear leaving Israel more than being mobilized or hit by a rocket or whatever.

Both these things punish dissenters. When a regime is bad, you should encourage dissent. When instead your media and politicians punish dissenters of that regime directly or via causing such sentiments, it means they support the regime.

In case of Israel it’s very visible, in case of Russia - it’s convenient to have a regime selling useful fossil fuels and grain without considering what its population thinks, keeping western politicians on payroll, keeping status quo in relations, not thinking about any uncertainty of an actually democratic Russia, for example, diverting from fossil fuel trade (Dutch sickness is a thing), or maybe actually being a useful part of BRICS, or maybe fixing a few frozen conflicts which are very profitable. And by now if Russia’s regime dies, I suppose plenty of compromising information will leak about those politicians.

They really need another round of denazification.

That’s Mandela effect. There was so much talk in Western countries of denazification, even to the degree of deurbanization of Germany (like Morgenthau plan), that everybody missed that it never actually happened

I’m more about separation of addressing data and data model from addressing services and service model for storing and processing it, to make those uniform, because in uniformity lies efficiency and redundancy and ability to switch service models, and uniformity inside proprietary services is already achieved, so in this case uniformity works for the people.

I mean, that’s probably what you meant, I’m being this specific to fight my own distractions and fuzziness of thought.

Well, in the Soviet example everything was government.

And governments seem to be so excited by the prospects of this “AI” so it’s pretty clear that it’s still their desire most of all.