Ricardo Signes 

@rjbs@social.semiotic.systems
333 Followers
86 Following
2.2K Posts
Programming, empathy, good drinks, and bad movies. Director @ Fastmail.
Home pagehttps://rjbs.cloud/
GitHubhttps://github.com/rjbs
Lipogramshttps://oulipo.social/@rjbs

@adrianh that reminds me, I visited a very concrete place last month and thought of your calendar…

https://flic.kr/p/2rdsm2G

https://flic.kr/p/2rdnPVo

Rio's Metropolitan Cathedral

Flickr
The Americans. How weird to make a 70-some episode commercial for a defunct self-improvement program.
@faberfedor Yeah, I thought it was a good album, but so far doesn't hold a candle to the earlier stuff. (Also, "Autobiography of Mistachuck" I might like better than any of the PE albums!)
Today we rewatch Final Destination 3, because it has fireworks.
@faberfedor Yeah, I haven't really bothered other than an automatic sleep focus. But it feels a lot like "you set this up to protect yourself from an app; now it wants to know what you're doing"

@faberfedor It's a setting where you say "When I'm [At Home], these apps have their push notifications muted or deferred until the summary, and this other stuff happens, and my icons move around."

https://support.apple.com/en-eg/guide/mac-help/mchl613dc43f/mac

Set up a Focus on Mac

On your Mac, set a Focus to pause and silence notifications so you can work or play undistracted.

Apple Support

Hm. OneDrive just asked to know what my current "Focus" in macOS is. The OS said, "Can it have permission to share your focus?" The app elaborated, "It needs to know your focus so it can decide what notifications to show."

I thought that the OS did the filtering, so the app didn't have to know. If true, it feels like the app is lying to me, and wants to know that so it can perform analytics on my focuses. This makes me want to enable even fewer permissions!

I've referenced it enough that now it's all I can hear when I read it. Now you have to hear it too 🙉 https://ericwbailey.website/published/you-must-listen-to-rfc-2119/
You MUST listen to RFC 2119

It turns out you can just pay people to do things.

@mjd ( Hitler learns topology )

This is not a conspiracy theory: Many of the devices living in your home are quietly collecting towering heaps of information about you.

Your TV, your speakers, your doorbell, your security system, your thermostat, even your earbuds — all of them are involved. Some of that data may be shared, analyzed, and then sold to the highest bidder, hundreds of times a day, by organizations you’ve never heard of.

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/advice-smart-devices-data-tracking/

Archive:

https://archive.is/e253F

#privacy #Bigdata

Yes, Your TV Is Probably Spying on You. Your Fridge, Too. Here’s What They Know.

Devices in your home are quietly collecting information about you. Some of that data may be shared, analyzed, and sold by organizations you’ve never heard of. Maybe it’s fine. Maybe not.

Wirecutter: Reviews for the Real World
×

@simontatham I wonder if some of this is a misunderstanding of the set of information you may be required to use to solve it. e.g I played a bit prompted by this toot, and ran into a game which had a corner like this.

Game is perfectly solvable, but only using the information that there are 170 mines on the board. You can't solve this corner with only local information, which surprised me.

(https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/mines.html#30x16:15,0,m63e3099956808ffbfa625e4c0b131198ba6da37aed14ffb3997c11081dfb2f16679f372561b93369f1db2f87bf1c442346633ed9763ca41436888873 if you're interested)

@DRMacIver @simontatham Indeed, the total number of mines is sometimes required.
@abacabadabacaba @simontatham Yeah, I figured it was intentional, but what I meant is that I bet at least some people thinking they've found an unsolvable puzzle have run into this. Certainly when I ran into it I had a "Huh. What? ... Oh, right" moment, and I could imagine missing the second half of that.