America Needs Economic Warriors - sh.itjust.works
> Washington’s mixed track record reflects more than simply individual policies
gone awry. It reflects a competition between one rival that struggles to play
the long game and another that has mastered it. The United States has deployed
existing tools to new challenges, often without fully anticipating the
consequences. It has yet to demonstrate its ability to systematically connect
dots across policy domains, develop economic war-games, and devise strategies as
part of a comprehensive and effective approach to economic security. > The
United States, in other words, has improvised piecemeal policies and hoped for
the best, while China has fused strategic vision with institutional coordination
and dedicated resources to developing the human capital needed to pull off such
an approach. Washington needs to raise its economic security game. To do so, it
needs to nurture a new class of economic warriors adept in the new tools of
national power, resilience, and global influence. … > What many in Washington
often overlook is that China’s competitive success is a function not simply of
party diktats but of the resourcefulness of its trained personnel, as well.
China’s 2023–2027 National Cadre Training Plan calls for officials to master
global economics, supply chain resilience, dual-use technology, and financial
risk via mandatory training programs using online self-study and in-person
“collective training” sessions. At the Central Party School, cadres study
international political economy, the Belt and Road Initiative, and China’s
framework for assessing national strength. Elite universities extend the
pipeline: the Seven Sons of National Defense, a grouping of public universities
affiliated with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, trains
technologists for strategic industries. Tsinghua University and Wuhan University
offer research, advisory, and training activities related to BRI. The China
University of Labor Relations trains foreign trade union leaders on Chinese
economic and labor theory and practice to build solidarity among BRI partners. >
This institutional architecture embodies what Dan Wang, currently a research
fellow at the Hoover History Lab at Stanford, has called China’s “engineering
state”—a system that channels technical talent toward national economic
objectives, forming an ecosystem designed to produce officials who can “win wars
without fighting” by mastering markets, logistics, and technology. Chinese
decision-makers have long understood that winning the geoeconomic long game
requires cultivating a pipeline of top talent with breadth and depth across
technology, economics, and investment.