Laurence Dierickx

@ohmyshambles
107 Followers
257 Following
327 Posts
Interdisciplinary research on journalism, AI, fact-checking, teaching digital and data journalism. Find me here : https://bsky.app/profile/ohmyshambles.bsky.social
Websitehttps://ohmybox.info
Toolboxhttps://start.me/p/PwPqdn/toolbox
The challenges of training journalists in AI - Journalists use AI technologies daily without necessarily understanding what’s going on behind the screen. From research to translation, transcription, and even automated content creation, AI is woven into the fabric of modern journalism. The question, then, is: What does it mean to train journalists on AI? https://ohmybox.info/the-challenges-of-training-journalists-in-ai/
The challenges of training journalists in AI

Journalists use AI technologies daily without necessarily understanding what's going on behind the screen. From research to translation, transcription, and even automated content creation, AI is woven into the fabric of modern journalism. The question, then, is: What does it mean to train journalists on AI?

OHMYBOX
Rethinking core journalism skills in the age of AI - What does it mean to be a journalist in an era when AI technology is automating a wide range of tasks once performed exclusively by humans? Rapid advances in AI-driven journalism – from automated news writing and data analysis to real-time content generation – raise pressing questions about the evolving role of human journalists and the division of labour between humans and machines.
https://ohmybox.info/rethinking-core-journalism-skills-in-the-age-of-ai/
Rethinking core journalism skills in the age of AI

To ask what makes a reporter human is to ask what are the core skills of initial journalism training. This article attempts to identify the skills that are becoming obsolete and to highlight the human qualities that really make a difference. By focusing on curiosity, empathy and ethical storytelling, it aims to stimulate discussion about how journalism training needs to evolve to meet the demands of a changing media landscape in the AI age, while preserving the values that define the profession.

OHMYBOX
Exploring 20 sets of tasks for using large language models (LLMs) in journalism (under human supervision) https://ohmybox.info/20-sets-of-tasks-for-using-llms-in-journalism/
20 sets of tasks for using large language models (LLMs) in journalism

This list ilustrates the potential for using Large Language Models (LLMs) in journalism, and how they can be used under human supervision.

OHMYBOX
#teasing 1st edition of "Histories of Digital Journalism - The Interplay of Technology, Society and Culture", edited by Tamas Tofalvy and Igor Vobič https://www.routledge.com/Histories-of-Digital-Journalism-The-Interplay-of-Technology-Society-and-Culture/Tofalvy-Vobic/p/book/9781032795072?srsltid=AfmBOoqCHYRFGLSeOsOcDWE9zpVF6BwG3XjEhM04MixElcAOAIje8Vec
Histories of Digital Journalism: The Interplay of Technology, Society and Culture

Building on the momentum of the recent “historical turn” in digital media and Internet studies, this volume explores how digital journalism has developed from a historical perspective. With contributions from established and emerging scholars from Europe, Asia, South and North America, the book investigates not only how established journalistic systems transformed in the early days of digital, but how the structural, technological and cultural changes induced by digitization have reconfigu

Routledge & CRC Press
AI and GAI technologies can streamline fact-checking tasks, but human oversight remains crucial. Nordic fact-checkers value AI as a complementary tool, but its full integration depends on overcoming trust and transparency challenges. Read the full paper here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27523543241288846
Contextual Affordances: AI use in fact-checking is shaped by organizational culture, available resources, and professional practices. Fact-checking organizations with stronger technological infrastructures are more open to AI but resource constraints also slow adoption. Fitness-for-Use Affordances: AI tools need to fit fact-checkers’ specific needs, but they often don't.
LLMs appear to be game changers, as our respondents reported functional affordances mostly to support secondary tasks such as generating code, creating visualizations, and improving written content, but not in all organizations.Perceived Affordances: Fact-checkers recognize AI’s potential to augment their work but remain cautious. They find AI helpful for repetitive tasks but are skeptical of its ability to fully replace human judgment, especially given issues with accuracy.
Considering its benefits for examining the interaction between artefacts and actors with specific goals and capabilities, we explore four complementary affordances. Functional Affordances: Despite the widespread use of these tools, many fact-checkers remain unaware of whether they contain AI, highlighting the need for greater transparency about the technological underpinnings of these tools.

🧵 Outsourcing, Augmenting, or Complicating: The Dynamics of AI in Fact-Checking Practices in the Nordics - This study looks at how fact-checkers use AI in their daily work in a special issue in Emerging Media with my awesome colleagues Stefanie Sirén-Heikel and Carl-Gustav Lindén. The study uses the theory of affordances to understand how they shape AI integration in fact-checking.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27523543241288846

The paper is published in open access in Ethics and Information Technology, co-signed with a stellar Bergen’s team

Dierickx, L., Opdahl, A.L., Khan, S.A. et al. A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism. Ethics and Information Technology 26, 64 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09801-6

A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism - Ethics and Information Technology

AI-driven journalism refers to various methods and tools for gathering, verifying, producing, and distributing news information. Their potential is to extend human capabilities and create new forms of augmented journalism. Although scholars agreed on the necessity to embed journalistic values in these systems to make AI systems accountable, less attention was paid to data quality, while the results’ accuracy and efficiency depend on high-quality data in any machine learning task. Assessing data quality in the context of AI-driven journalism requires a broader and interdisciplinary approach, relying on the challenges of data quality in machine learning and the ethical challenges of using machine learning in journalism. To better identify these, we propose a data quality assessment framework to support the collection and pre-processing stages in machine learning. It relies on three of the core principles of ethical journalism—accuracy, fairness, and transparency—and participates in the shift from model-centric to data-centric AI, by focusing on data quality to reduce reliance on large datasets with errors, making data labelling consistent, and better integrating journalistic knowledge.

SpringerLink