João Ohara

284 Followers
152 Following
73 Posts
Theory and Philosophy of History @ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Websitehttps://oharajrm.com/
PronounsHe, Him
I find it funny when monolingual English speakers talk about being overwhelmed by how much they need to read. Like, my dude, did you know people think and write in other languages too? And that they are expected to know the literature in their language AND in English too? Cry me a river.

Philosophy has a WEIRD people problem too: “we analyzed 171 experimental philosophy studies published between 2017 and 2023. We found that most studies tested only Western populations but generalized beyond them without justification”

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/hasty-generalizations-are-pervasive-in-experimental-philosophy-a-systematic-analysis/27AF62B58334B5120F3317CE9E6259C7

The argument for "depoliticized history" usually comes from the worst right-wing grifters around. This is the reason why it has become almost impossible to have a decent discussion about history and values.
CfP for a theme issue, "History and Ethics", that I will be co-editing with my colleague Andre Freixo in the journal History & Theory.
https://historyandtheory.org/announcements
News & Announcements — History and Theory

History and Theory

'Latin America is taking on a pioneering role in this. In Latin America, scientific outputs are considered a public good. Free-to-publish and free-to-read cooperative publishing is supported by non-commercial and publicly funded infrastructure. Ninety-five per cent of Latin American journals are diamond open access: community-driven and collaborative platforms with no article processing charges. Their example shows us that research is a more global and diverse enterprise than is typically acknowledged. By including diverse voices, they contribute substantially to the academic landscape and the accessibility and dissemination of research3. Unfortunately, these journals tend to be excluded by indexing systems, which causes science published outside of the Global North to not receive the attention that it deserves.'

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01637-2

The future of academic publishing - Nature Human Behaviour

Academic publishing is the backbone of science dissemination –– but is the current system fit for purpose? We asked a diverse group of scientists to comment on the future of publishing. They discuss systemic issues, challenges, and opportunities, and share their vision for the future.

Nature
CfP: Documenter les humanités numériques francophones

Photographs from the Holocaust

We can learn much from photography that originated during the Holocaust and Holodomor, and other periods of atrocity. But It is crucial to consider ethical issues about the use of these photographs -- the content and the provenance. This post considers the important photo "Boy in the Warsaw Ghetto" and its origin in SS military units under SS-Brigadeführer Jürgen Stroop who oversaw the extermination of the ghetto uprising.

#genocide

https://undsoc.org/2023/06/02/photographs-from-the-holocaust/

Photographs from the Holocaust

image: Warsaw Ghetto Memorial 1948 (detail) An earlier post analyzed Wendy Lower’s stunningly original treatment of a single photograph of a 1941 mass killing in the town of Miropol, Ukraine …

Understanding Society
Ian Hacking, an influential and prolific philosopher known for his work on various topics in philosophy of science, has died. https://dailynous.com/2023/05/10/ian-hacking-1936-2023/
Ian Hacking (1936-2023) | Daily Nous

Ian Hacking, emeritus professor of philosophy at the University of Toronto and an influential figure in the philosophy of science, has died. Professor Hacking is well known for his work across a range of subjects, including philosophy of science, the philosophy of probability, philosophy of math, philosophy of language, philosophy of mental illness, social construction, and the philosophy of history, among others. His books include The Logic of Statistical Inference (1965), The Emergence of Probability (1975), Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (1975), The Taming of Chance (1990), Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory (1995), Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses (1998), The Social Construction of What? (1999), Historical Ontology (2002), and Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? (2014). You can learn more about his writings here. Hacking joined the faculty at Toronto in 1983. Prior to that, he held positions at Stanford University, University of Cambridge, University of British Columbia, University of Virginia, and Princeton University, as well as visiting positions at a number of institutions. He earned his PhD from Cambridge and undergraduate degrees from Cambridge and British Columbia. Over the course of his career, Hacking was the recipient of many fellowships, awards, and honors, the Killam Prize in 2002,  the Gold Medal for Achievement in Research from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada in 2008, the Holberg Prize in 2009, and the Balzan Prize in 2014. In the citation for the Holberg Prize, the judges write: Hacking has been called a “true bridge-builder”. He is so in several respects. Hacking’s approach is historical, interdisciplinary, and always highly original. Furthermore, his research is a central contribution to bridging the gap that characterised the academic debates of the latter decades of the 20th century on how to understand science. This gap often manifested itself in terms of contested understandings of scientific knowledge, and in particular around the degree to which scientific knowledge was to be seen as socially and historically constructed. Always far from the trenches of these so-called Science Wars, Hacking paved the way forward and showed by example how analytical and historical perspectives may work in combination. He died on May 10th. The University of Toronto..

Daily Nous

I'm almost pathologically curious, so being a tenured professor is the closest I'll have to the ideal job. Despite all admin and other stuff, I see it as getting paid to read and think about a lot of stuff with little to no constraints. All I have to do is then teach about it.

One problem is that I'll never be a specialist on anything and so will never have a chance to move jobs elsewhere. I'm just not so sure being a dilettante is such a negative anymore.

Anti-realism and the decline of truth – Victor's website