Codeberg seems like the best option ATM for me: codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/…/bylaws.md

No not crazy, quite interesting actually! Though, I wonder how this theory could lead to answer the hard problem of consciousness. If we are orchestrated how can we say these event haven’t happened before? And how come we are the current orchestration now. Perhaps if the theory unfolds it could be answered?

But if you are consciousness orchestra A and I am B. A and B are of different patterns but why are you A and I B?

I think many kids did but to what point, I certainly thought it was unexplainable but to suggest the possibility of my own experience not be truly my own, no. I believed for a long time my subjective experience existed and is explained in physical reality therefore atheism is the logical conclusion.

If you think that subjective experience may or may not exist or be all sorts of things but never truly know, wouldn’t you have to reject atheism and religion. Yet many people subscribe to these beliefs including myself. I don’t think it’s a given that people don’t believe in their subjective existence.

The conclusions of Tao I would be on the same page there, some form of hedonism/utilitarianism to live life by.

I’ll give it a read then and probably come back with more questions then.

Do you think that it is seems like the best conclusion to subjective reality is none then? This question really came from thinking about ideas like the philosophical zombie problem, after chatting with my partner about physical vs non physical consciousness. It seems to me that we are limited to comprehend outside (if there even is an outside) of subjective reality.

This is great! What are your thoughts on Tao Te Chang?