iOS dev Β· Jailbreak tweak dev Β· Movie lover Β· Anti-Zionist β’ Anti-capitalist
Views are my own, not my employer's
| GitHub | https://github.com/NSExceptional |
| Cydia Repo | https://nscake.github.io |
| Has | four cats πββ¬πββ¬ππββ¬ |
| π | DFW, TX |
Hey @ryanashcraft! Some FoodNoms feedback
I can't easily tell where food I'm logging is about to go, since main screen (behind this dialog) uses relative dates but none of the date pickers do. It would be nice if the main screen only showed the relative dates as a sub-heading above or around the actual date. I always want to see the actual date.
Or at the very least, the date pickers should also use relative dates, so that I can tell at a glance where this log is about to go π
ο£Ώ's iOS engineers are the best at doing the bare minimum. Just straight
results.filter { $0.contains(query) }
No query.trimWhitespace, no fuzzy search, no off-by-one typo searchβ¦
ο£Ώ: let's put all the system apps in the same list of third party apps so you HAVE to search for everyrhing, and then make the search experience awful
This seems super broken? (The "safety filter" applying every single time, regardless of what's underneath)
@gregheo are you still on the photos team? π
@ryanashcraft do you think it would be useful to add a toggle to FoodNoms AI to only add things I've previously logged for a given query? I noticed when I use it, it will make up the things it can't find, or sometimes use the wrong items
For example I told it I had
β’ 2 Chick-Fil-A sandwiches with cheese
β’ A pineapple sunjoy
It hallucinated both of them for all I know, instead of choosing from any of my previously logged foods that pretty closely match my descriptions:
@kkolakowski Hey! Do you think you could enable multi-select in this list in DevCleaner? I'm unable to select multiple by shift-clicking in order to toggle them all at once. You can't tell in the video but that's what I'm doing when the mouse pauses.
One other thing, it looks like pressing the space bar to check the box of a selected item makes the list lose focus for some reason? You can kinda see that in the video
How the hell was this use case overlooked when designing the variadic generics / packs API?
I should absolutely be able to "spread" an array into a parameter pack at runtime
(also, peep the totally broken error message)
