I post the only way forward for America is the civil discourse between Americans insofar as the only way forward for all people is civil discourse between one and other. We ought to sonder the schism, not in the non-player character sense alone, but in the secondary player sense, using our power to sense what escapes us discursively to allow “the other self” the opportunity to deconstruct our initial discursive self until all living human organisms have fully vetted the sensory experience
@sz_duras if you look at the lyrics of Zion train and think what it means. Leaving the Babylon system, heading to Zion. But Zion is not a destination but a deterritorialization. A metamorphosis from oppression. The transformation itself. If meaning itself can be changed to oppression through fascist micro escalation, ithen meaning itself can be reappropriated from oppression when minor literature co-opts the words repurposing them as a tool against Babylon oppression
@sz_duras and yet Zionism from a Rasta is the complete opposite of colonial oppression
„Anaxagoras and Parmenides had a listener named Socrates… until now there was no such thing as mind and matter, subject and object, form and substance.“ -Robert Pirsig
And so the cracks in the structure of knowledge go deep to the PreSocratics. Socrates‘ hidden world of „truth and justice“ was as fanciful as the rhetoricians he wishes to criticize. And think of how much of our legal system is based on the „Socratic Method“ used to teach in most American law schools. But wait….theres more….
Rhizomatically, we could combine the benefits of coalition government from European pastures with the diffuse capabilities of the tri-cameral system from American pastures. Simultaneously done there would be no need for world government. Only an understanding in the stratosphere of human understanding that present human emotion is valued over historical accuracy. Let’s evolve together
@brrbrr desiring flows, and the body without organs. Have you ever read Erewhon by Samuel Butler? Great book
@brrbrr looking at Open Society and it’s Enemies by Karl Popper goes over a similar line of thought. Popper also describes the importance in applying the scientific method to democracy. I.e. a piecemeal solution. More plainly put, fix what’s broken and keep what is working.
I feel safe posting on mastodon