“fun” little historical factoid on that. WAY back when the idea of national standards was being developed around 1992ish all the various disciplines started working on their stuff. A lot of them had agreed standards by 1994 or shortly thereafter. History/Social Studies took almost 10+ years to get that far because they were arguing over if dates/actions were more important or trends/impacts were more important. As it was explained to me at the time (2006ish) the issue was just stating facts or making them meaningful.

Disclaimer: I’m not claiming the above is scientific fact. That is what was relayed to me when taking a non-history course 20 years ago. Still, a fun thought experiment on what is truly important in learning.

practice donuts

I believe you’re looking for the words “whipping shitties”

thank you

Hell, why would the Telari build the boats in the first place if they didn’t want them to sail?

I had to teach a zero period jazz band when I student taught. Waking up that early to drive the 45 minutes suuuuuckkkked

We’ve known this for decades, but almost no districts will make the changes necessary. The youngest grades (K-4 or 5) should be the first schools to start in the morning, and the HS the last.

What happens when that is suggested is people balk at either sports programs needing to be cut or the argument that the older siblings need to be out of school to babysit the younger siblings.

not everyone who IS American wants to read it all the tome either.

That depends on what your definition of the word “is” is.

Weren’t they looking into savings and loan or real estate dealings to begin with?

Came in to say exactly this.