It actually makes it an American confederate territory.

Billionaires and charities are the polar extremes of the same policy failure.

Neither should exist, but when they do, they should be tolerated for the shortest practicable lifespan.

Perpetually charities are a grift whose primary purpose is to serve as a social responsibility abdication sink for governments and corporations, and secondarily artificially inflate the social legitimacy of churches and faith based organisations.

Temporary charitable needs are better served by mutual aid.

Every healthy society needs a robust guillotine maintenance and repair workforce.

The percentage of sociopaths involved with defining a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

I don’t recall where I originally found it, I’ve also seen ‘morbidly wealthy’.

Not sure if this is missing a /s, but my suggestion is an opening salvo, not the end goal.

Further, I’m not an advocate for anyone to eat shit. The rich should be mulched as a form of resource recycling.

Authoritarianism is an admission of abject weakness.

White supremacists are the weakest and most brittle snowflakes.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

Eliminating billionaires will neutralise their ability to manipulate society at the level they currently do.

Money doesn’t originate from the private sector, if it did it would be fraud. The funding of services, in an economy with sovereignty of its currency, originates from legislation through the budgets passed by the relevant agents.

Permitting any entity to grow more powerful than the entity responsible for regulating it is carcinogenic, if not suicidal.

Why are you defending the tolerance of sociopaths?

If they can’t find a buyer for their assets, they’d could give them away or destroy them. It’s irrelevant how they diminish their hoard, the point is that they cease their possession of it.