Michael J. Kane

511 Followers
482 Following
41 Posts
Posts in personal capacity. PSY/open science, working memory, attention, mindwandering (also education; skepticism). Living well with #Tourette. Art: Miles Johnston; Haring. Website: https://sites.google.com/uncg.edu/kane-idea-lab?pli=1
Lab Websitehttps://sites.google.com/uncg.edu/kane-idea-lab
OSFhttps://osf.io/dashboard
ORCiDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-5430
Some key info from the SIDIC website:
Are you interested in cognitive individual differences? The Symposium for Individual Differences in Cognition (SIDIC) will debut as an affiliate meeting at the 2023 Psychonomics Meeting in SF. Check it out & please consider submitting/attending: https://caliberlab.wixsite.com/sidic2023
Welcome | SIDIC 2023

SIDIC 2023
New article in-press from our lab on measuring sustained attention. Matt Welhaf and I argue, using re-analyses of 2 large factor-analytic studies, that construct valid assessment of sustained attention ability should combine mind-wandering rates with performance/RT variability metrics. Their *covariation* provides a more valid measure than does either alone:
https://psyarxiv.com/4qk56

18 corrections in a 659-word AI-written Men's Journal article about low testosterone. AI language tools generate cogent word patterns, not facts - an obvious issue that so many companies are going to embarrass themselves learning in the coming years

https://futurism.com/neoscope/magazine-mens-journal-errors-ai-health-article

Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article

The owners of Sports Illustrated and Men’s Journal promised to be virtuous with AI. Then they bungled their very first AI story.

Futurism
Know your shit (as opposed to know you're shit 🤣 ) :

New to mastodon. Here's a video in which I showcase the changing sound of English from the 8th century to the 19th, from Beowulf to Ben Franklin's Fart Joke and John Keats

I tend to make a lot of content like this as a hobby.

Also I post about various weird questions in linguistics.

Also I translate poetry, like a lot.

@linguistics

So, ChatGPT can do a pretty convincing simulation of a subject's output on a verbal fluency task for the category "Animals":
@brentwroberts This looks pretty terrible. I also tried it and it seemed to me to be about as far off as possible. https://testyourself.psychtests.com/testid/2299
Zodiac Signs Personality Test

Do you live up to your zodiac sign's expectations? Were you born in the right astrological sign? Take the Zodiac Signs Personality Test and find out which zodiac personality type fits you best.

@Daniel_Heck I hadn't seen this, so thanks for posting. We used to talk about that Meehl quote in my grad methods class, both in regard to PSY theory & in response to calls for "New Statistics," but we never ended in a satisfying place...

In our lab meeting, we discussed an interesting paper on #theory testing and effect sizes:

When the numbers do not add up: The practical limits of stochastologicals for soft psychology (Broers, 2021) https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970557

"The key question must be how a scientific discipline that rests on purely verbal theories succeeds in inserting quantity into its thinking. The important follow-up question must be what meaning, if any, do such quantities have at the theoretical level of psychology."