It is different from carbon credits. I don’t think you get a rebate from not emitting. If the cost is passed onto the consumer when there are good alternatives, they will be out-competed. One thing with few alternatives is transportation, which low-income households spend more on already.

I’ve changed this on all my terminals and I’m not ashamed of it.

If you intended RFC to be a reference to IETF RFCs you should now it originally stood for Requests for Comments before simply being referred to as RFCs. (link) I didn’t have to read your document in detail, but it seems reasonable and well thought out.

Maybe as practice you could have the subject facing more to the side, and move the viewer closer. That way it’ll be easier to notice if the features are really placed on a sphere, like if the eyes are different sizes. The hair has lots of potential depth, but perhaps a hat with flaps and a sawtooth pattern along the edge would be easier to apply perspective to and see if it’s correct.

I think bandwidth and data caps are a hindrance to this. Looking on the bright side, at least something would have to be better in this dystopian future, which yes, we are moving toward.

Got this by using “force RTL layout direction for all locales” in Android developer options:

So that’s the only meaning of the teletubby and the angry looks, that’s it’s the odd one out? Not that it’s childish/naive/dumb or bad?

Nobody has said that they are working on it on GitHub.

It tries to subscribe to the one on lemmy.world as well as the most subscribed one on any instance.