Here are our current consent templates:

Explanation of how we do consent, parametrization options: https://lookit.readthedocs.io/projects/frameplayer/en/latest/components/exp-lookit-video-consent/doc.html

(These are set to be fully configurable because there is no section that some IRB does not want to potentially modify...as they should be able to do, under the current model, but hence the problem)

Actual text here: https://github.com/lookit/research-resources/tree/master/Legal

With an actually standardized consent process, not only can families get used to seeing & agreeing (or not) to the same terms, as a platform we can provide education to families that will enable them to better understand their choices and what it means to participate in research!

So on to my question: Have you seen something like this work before? What would keep you/your IRB from being able to work with a solution like this? What kinds of provisions would make you feel comfortable approving something like this for researchers at your institution?

And finally, where can I learn about this other than social media? What kinds of groups/forums/conferences might be good places to learn more about this?

One example of what I'm thinking about is this excellent project - open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io Unlike this project, I am not handling health/biometric data, I *am* handling data from minors, and like this project I am very invested in ethical solutions for open data sharing